Employed Vocational Rehabilitation Applicants with Visual Disabilities: Factors Associated with Timely Service Delivery

Abstract

Introduction:

Employed applicants for vocational rehabilitation need timely services to improve the likelihood of their successful job retention or career advancement. Little research exists that examines timeliness of services among employed applicants, particularly for applicants with visual disabilities. This study investigated time from vocational rehabilitation application to a signed Individualized Plan for Emplolyment (IPE) for employed applicants with visual disabilities.

Method:

The sample of 5,096 competitively employed vocational rehabilitation applicants from the FY2015 RSA-911 report was combined with survey responses from 51 vocational rehabilitation agencies about services to persons with visual disabilities. Multilevel modeling was used to examine effects of state-level and individual-level characteristics and cross-level interactions on the length of waiting time from vocational rehabilitation application to signed IPE.

Results:

The time from application to IPE was shorter for employed applicants with visual disabilities who received services from separate vocational rehabilitation agencies compared to that of combined vocational rehabilitation agencies. Employed vocational rehabilitation applicants with visual disabilities waited longer if they were younger, non-White, or received disability benefits. Official job-retention policies in state vocational rehabilitation agencies appeared to reduce the delay of IPE implementation for persons with secondary disabilities, for applicants who received disability benefits, and for persons who worked more hours per week.

Discussion:

Additional research to determine how vocational rehabilitation can provide services to employed persons as soon as possible after application is indicated, particularly for persons applying to combined agencies.

Implications for practitioners:

Vocational rehabilitation providers should explore ways to expedite service delivery, particularly for persons who are younger, non-White, or receiving disability benefits. Implementing official vocational rehabilitation policies for addressing job-retention and career-advancement cases may be one avenue to expedite services to some employed applicants.

Keywords

blind/visual disability employment vocational rehabilitation services

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allaire

S. H.

Niu

LaValley

M. P.

(2005). Employment and satisfaction outcomes from a job retention intervention delivered to persons with chronic diseases. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 48(2), 100–109.

Cavenaugh

B. S.

(2010). An update on services and outcomes of blind and visually impaired consumers served in separate and general/combined VR agencies. http://blind.msstate.edu/research/nrtc-publications/download/&

Crudden

(2002). Employment after vision loss: Results of a collective case study. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 96(9), 615–621.

Crudden

Giesen

J. M.

Sui

(2018). Contrasting competitively employed and unemployed VR applicants with visual disabilities: Characteristics and VR service delivery patterns. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 49(1), 117–126.

Crudden

Steverson

A. C.

(2018). Job retention and career advancement: VR agencies serving consumers with blindness or vision loss and WIOA. Journal of Rehabilitation, 84(4), 38–44.

Dutta

Gervey

Chan

Chou

Ditchman

(2008). Vocational rehabilitation services and employment outcomes for people with disabilities: A United States study. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 18, 326–334.

Erickson

Lee

von Schrader

(2017). Disability statistics from the American community survey (ACS). Cornell University Yang-Tan Institute (YTI). http://www.disabilitystatistics.org

Giesen

J. M.

Cavenaugh

B. S.

(2013). Disability insurance beneficiaries with visual impairments in vocational rehabilitation: Socio-demographic influences on employment. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 107(6), 453–467.

Giesen

J. M.

Cavenaugh

B. S.

Sansing

W. K.

(2004). Access to vocational rehabilitation: The impact of race and ethnicity, 98(7), 103–111.

10.

Giesen

J. M.

Lang

A. H.

(2018). Predictors of earnings enabling likely roll departure for SSDI beneficiaries with visual impairments in vocational rehabilitation. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 29(3), 166–177.

11.

Honeycutt

Stapleton

(2013). Striking while the iron is hot: The effect of vocational rehabilitation service wait times on employment outcomes for applicants receiving Social Security disability benefits. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 39(2), 137–152.

12.

Ipsen

Goe

(2016). Factors associated with consumer engagement and satisfaction with the Vocational Rehabilitation program. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 44(1), 85–96.

13.

Koch

L.C.

Rumrill

P. D.

Conyers

Wohlford

(2013). A narrative literature review regarding job retention strategies for people with chronic illnesses. Work, 46, 125–134.

14.

McDonnall

M. C.

(2017). Rates of employment at application for VR consumers (Unpublished RSA-911 data analyses). Mississippi State University: National Research and Training Center on Blindness and Low Vision.

15.

McDonnall

M. C.

O’Mally

Crudden

(2014). Employer knowledge of and attitudes toward individuals who are blind or visually impaired as employees. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 108, 213–225.

16.

National Research and Training Center on Blindness and Low Vision. (2019). CPS data. Data Corner. https://www.blind.msstate.edu/data-corner/

17.

Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. (2017). Vocational rehabilitation services and supported employment services programs federal FY 2017 monitoring and technical assistance guide. https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/rehab/107-reports/2017/monitoring-and-technical-assistance-guide.pdf

18.

Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 34 C.F.R., § 2b. (1973). https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/34/361.41

19.

Rehabilitation Services Administration. (2013). Reporting manual for the case service report (RSA-911). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

20.

Rehabilitation Services Administration. (2014). Rehabilitation Act as amended by WIOA: An overview. Presentation to the council of state administrators of vocational rehabilitation. Miami, FL. http://www2.ed.gov/policy/speced/leg/rehab-act-as-amended-by-wioa.pdf

21.

Rigles

Ipsen

Arnold

Seekins

(2011). Experiences of rural vocational rehabilitation clients who leave the system prematurely: A qualitative exploration. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 54(3), 164–174.

22.

Rumrill

P. D.

Schuyler

B. R.

Longden

J. C.

(1997). Profiles of on-the-job accommodations needed by professional employees who are blind. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 91(1), 66–77.

23.

Sikka

Stephens

(1997). Intervention practices in the retention of competitive employment among individuals who are blind or visually impaired. National Research and Training Center on Blindness & Low Vision, Mississippi State University. http://www.blind.msstate.edu/research/nrtc-publications/download

24.

U.S. Department of Education. (2014). The workforce innovation and opportunity Act overview of Title IV: Amendments to the rehabilitation Act of 1973. https://www.aucd.org/docs/wioa-changes-to-rehab-act%20(1).pdf

25.

Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act of 2014, 81 Fed. Reg. 55630 (proposed August 19, 2016) (to be codified at 34 C.F.R. pts. 361, 363, 397).