BezyakJ. L.DitchmanN.BurkeJ.ChanF. (2013). Communities of practice: A knowledge translation tool for rehabilitation professionals. Rehabilitation Research, Policy, and Education, 27, 89–103.
2.
Centre National de Ressources Handicaps Rares—Surdicécité. (n.d.). Ressources doc CRESAM surdicécité[Resource document by National Resource Center for Rare Disabilities-Deafblindness]. Retrieved fromhttp://doc.cresam.org
3.
DammeyerJ. H. (2014). Deafblindness: A review of the literature. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 42, 554–562.
4.
LiL. C.GrimshawJ. M.NielsenC.JuddM.CoyteP. C.GrahamI. D. (2009). Use of communities of practice in business and health care sectors: A systematic review. Implementation Science, 4, 9.
5.
MazerB.KairyD.GuindonA.GirardM.SwaineB.KehayiaE.LabbéD. (2015). Rehabilitation living lab in the mall community of practice: Learning together to improve rehabilitation, participation and social inclusion for people living with disabilities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12, 4439–4460.
6.
MöllerC. (2003). Deafblindness: Living with sensory deprivation. The Lancet, 362, S46–S47.
SimcockP. (2017). One of society’s most vulnerable groups? A systematically conducted literature review exploring the vulnerability of deafblind people. Health & Social Care in the Community, 25, 813–839.
9.
WengerÉ.McDermottR.SnyderW. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
10.
WittichW.SouthallK.SikoraL.WatanabeD. H.GagnéJ.-P. (2013). What’s in a name: Dual sensory impairment or deafblindness?The British Journal of Visual Impairment, 31, 198–207.
11.
WittichW.WatanabeD. H.GagnéJ.-P. (2012). Sensory and demographic characteristics of deafblindness rehabilitation clients in Montréal, Canada. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 32, 242–251.