Workplace Discrimination and Visual Impairment: A Comparison of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Charges and Resolutions under the Americans with Disabilities Act and Americans with Disabilities Amendments Act
Restricted accessCase reportFirst published online September, 2017
Workplace Discrimination and Visual Impairment: A Comparison of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Charges and Resolutions under the Americans with Disabilities Act and Americans with Disabilities Amendments Act
ADA Amendments Act of 2008, P.L. No. 110–325, § 122 Stat. 3553 (2008).
2.
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 21112 et seq. (2008).
3.
BlanckP. D. (1996). Empirical study of the Americans with Disabilities Act: Employment issues from 1990–1994. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 14, 5–27.
4.
BrostrandH. L. (2006). Tilting at windmills: Changing attitudes toward people with disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation, 72(1), 4–9.
5.
CrewsJ. E., & CampbellV. A. (2004). Vision impairment and hearing loss among community-dwelling older Americans: implications for health and functioning. American Journal of Public Health, 94(5), 823–829.
EEOC (U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission). (n.d.) Home page.Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.eeoc.gov
8.
GambleM. J.DowlerD. L., & HirshA. E. (2004). Informed decision making on assistive technology workplace accommodations for people with visual impairments. Work, 23(2), 123–130.
9.
GolubD. B. (2006). A model of successful work experience for employees who are visually impaired: The results of a study. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 100(12), 715–725.
10.
KampfeC. M.WadsworthJ. S.MamboleoG. I., & SchonbrunS. L. (2008). Aging, disability, and employment. Work, 31, 337–344.
11.
KayeH. S.JansL. H., & JonesE. C. (2011). Why don't employers hire and retain workers with disabilities?Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.21, 526–536.
12.
LynchK. A. (2013). Survey reveals myths and misconceptions abundant among hiring managers about the capabilities of people who are visually impaired. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 107(6), 408–410.
13.
McMahonB. T.ShawL. R., & JaetD. N. (1995). An empirical analysis: Employment and disability from an ADA litigation perspective. NARPPS Journal, 10(1), 3–14.
14.
PetrilaJ. (2009). Congress restores the Americans with Disabilities Act to its original intent. Psychiatric Services, 60(7), 878–879.
15.
RumrillP. D., & ScheffC. M. (1997). Impact of the ADA on the employment and promotion of persons who are visually impaired. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 91(5), 460–466.
16.
SimpsonM., & RogersP. (2002). Strategies for employing older workers with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 96(9), 672–675.
17.
SmithW. T., & AllenW. L. (2011). Implications of the 2008 Amendments to the Americans with Disabilities Act for medical education. Academic Medicine, 86(6), 768–772.
18.
StrobelW.FossaJ.ArthanatS., & BraceJ. (2006). Technology for access to text and graphics for people with visual impairments and blindness in vocational settings. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 24(2), 87–95.
19.
UngerD. D.RumrillP. D., & HennesseyM. L. (2005). Resolutions of ADA Title I cases involving people who are visually impaired: A comparative analysis. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 99(8), 453–463.
20.
VierlingL. E. (2009). Congress seeks to restore protection with the ADA Amendments Act of 2008. Professional Case Management, 14(5), 265–267.