AmatoS. (2002). Standards for competence in braille literacy skills in teacher preparation programs. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 96(3), 143–153.
2.
American Printing House for the Blind. (2014). Annual report 2014: Distribution of eligible students based on the federal quota census of January 7, 2013 (fiscal year 2014). Retrieved from http://www.aph.org/federal-quota/distribution-2014
3.
BlackorbyJ.ChorostM.GarzaN., & GuzmanA. (2003). The academic performance of secondary school students with disabilities. (NLTS2 Report). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nlts2.sri.com/reports/2003_11/nlts2_report_2003_11_ch4.pdf
4.
CowanN. (2010). The magical mystery four: How is working memory capacity limited, and why?Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 51–57.
5.
FrankelL.BrownsteinB.SoifferN., & HansenE. (2016). Development and initial evaluation of the ClearSpeak style for automated speaking of algebra. ETS Research Report Series, 2016(2), 1–43.
KappermanG., & StickenJ. (2003). A case for increased training in the Nemeth code of braille mathematics for teachers of students who are visually impaired. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 97, 110–112.
8.
MillerG. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.
9.
MullenE. A. (1990). Decreased braille literacy: A symptom of a system in need of reassessment. RE:view, 22(3), 164–169.
PapadopoulosK., & KoutsoklenisA. (2009). Reading media used by higher-education students and graduates with visual impairments in Greece. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 103(11), 772–777.
13.
RosenblumL. P., & AmatoS. (2004). Preparation in and use of the Nemeth braille code for mathematics by teachers of students with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 98(8), 484–498.
14.
SchroederF. (1989). Literacy: The key to opportunity. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 83(6), 290–293.