The Effect of the Color of a Long Cane Used by Individuals who Are Visually Impaired on the Yielding Behavior of Drivers

Abstract

Introduction

A new market trend offers long canes for individuals with visual impairments in a variety of colors; however, the impact of these colors is unknown to orientation and mobility (O&M) specialists and individuals who are blind or who have low vision. The authors examined the impact of cane color on drivers’ yielding behaviors; also, cane display effectiveness was assessed.

Methods

At traffic signal–controlled intersections, drivers’ yielding responses (yield–no yield and seconds to crosswalk) were recorded by two raters when a pedestrian presented one of two conditions (display and flagging) with four differently colored long canes (white, black, yellow, and green).

Results

In trials where the pedestrian used a flagging cane technique, the white cane achieved 290% more yielding than the green cane, 100% more yielding than the yellow cane, and 40% more yielding than the black. Statistical differences were found between the white-with-red cane and the yellow and green canes. The measure of drivers’ latency for moving forward was not statistically different between trials in which a pedestrian displayed a white cane at the crosswalk and trials in which no pedestrians were present.

Discussion

Cane color appears to have a substantial effect on drivers’ yielding responses. The results also indicate only a slight driver response to a highly visible cane display, confirming the results of previous studies that recommended more potent pedestrian movements to mitigate the threat from turning vehicles.

Implications for practitioners

O&M specialists and cane travelers need to consider the options for cane color when using a cane to cross streets. A white cane, flagged at the onset of the walk signal, can achieve more desirable responses from drivers than can the long canes of other colors. More effective cane behaviors exhibited by pedestrians who are visually impaired should always be considered by O&M instructors in order to influence drivers.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ashmead

D. H.

Guth

Wall

R. S.

Long

R. G.

, & Ponchillia

P. E.

(2005). Street crossing by sighted and blind pedestrians at a modern roundabout. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 131(11), 812–821.

Bourquin

Wall Emerson

Sauerburger

, & Barlow

(2014). Conditions that influence drivers’ yielding behavior in turning vehicles at intersections with traffic signal controls. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 108(3), 173–186.

Bourquin

Wall Emerson

Sauerburger

, & Barlow

(in press). Conditions that influence the behavior of drivers at roundabouts: Increasing yielding for pedestrians who are visually impaired. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness.

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Erdfelder

Faul

, & Buchner

(1996). G^*Power: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 1–11.

Geruschat

D. R.

, & Hassan

S. E.

(2005). Driver behavior in yielding to sighted and blind pedestrians at roundabouts. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 99(5), 286–302.

Goodhew

S. C.

Kendall

Ferber

, & Pratt

(2014). Setting semantics: Conceptual set can determine the physical properties that capture attention. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76(6), 1577–1589.

Harrell

W. A.

(1992). Driver response to a disabled pedestrian using a dangerous crosswalk. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12, 345–354.

Hughes

R. W.

Vachon

F. O.

, & Jones

D. M.

(2005). Auditory attentional capture during serial recall: Violations at encoding of an algorithm-based neural model? Journal of Experimental Psychology/Learning, Memory & Cognition, 31(4), 736–749.

10.

Jacobson

W. H.

(1993). The art and science of teaching orientation and mobility to persons with visual impairments. New York, NY: American Foundation for the Blind.

11.

Jacobson

W. H.

(2013). The art and science of teaching orientation and mobility to persons with visual impairments (2nd ed.). New York, NY: American Foundation for the Blind.

12.

Karkee

G. J.

(2005). Evaluation of the effectiveness of countermeasures to enhance pedestrian safety. Las Vegas, NV: University of Nevada.

13.

LaGrow

S. J.

, & Long

R. G.

(2011). Orientation and mobility: Techniques for independence (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Education and Rehabilitation of the Blind and Visually Impaired.

14.

LaGrow

S. J.

, & Weessies

M. J.

(1994). Orientation and mobility: Techniques for independence. Palmerston North, New Zealand: Dunmore Press.

15.

Lions International. (2014). White cane. Retrieved from http://www.lionsclubs.org/resources/EN/pdfs/iad413.pdf

16.

Most

S. B.

, & Astur

R. S.

(2007). Feature-based attentional set as a cause of traffic accidents. Visual Cognition, 15(2), 125–132.

17.

Most

S. B.

Scholl

B. J.

Clifford

E. R.

, & Simons

D. J.

(2005). What you see is what you set: Sustained inattentional blindness and the capture of awareness. Psychological Review, 112(1), 217–242.

18.

Penrod

W. M.

Zuchowski

Penrod

M. J.

Briscoe

Decarlo

Gasper

(2013, December 14). Cane color recognition by passing motorists. Paper presented at the Association for Education and Rehabilitation of the Blind and Visually Impaired International Orientation and Mobility Conference, New Orleans, LA.

19.

Roudsari

Kaufman

, & Koepsell

(2006). Turning at intersections and pedestrian injuries. Traffic Injury Prevention, 7(3), 283–289.

20.

Strong

(2009). The history of the white cane. Retrieved from http://www.acb.org/tennessee/white_cane_history.html

21.

Turatto

, & Galfano

(2001). Attentional capture by color without any relevant attentional set. Perception & Psycho-physics, 63(2), 286–297.

22.

Vanderbilt

(2008). Traffic: Why we drive the way we do (and what it says about us). New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.

23.

Viera

A. J.

, & Garrett

J. M.

(2005). Understanding interobserver agreement: The kappa statistic. Family Medicine, 37(5), 360–363.

24.

Vision Aware. (2015). Does the cane have to be white? Retrieved from http://www.visionaware.org/info/everyday-living/essential-skills/an-introduction-to-orientation-and-mobility-skills/does-the-cane-have-to-be-white/1235