The Experience of a Randomized Clinical Trial of Closed-Circuit Television versus Eccentric Viewing Training for People with Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Abstract

Introduction

In addition to optical devices, closed-circuit televisions (CCTVs) and eccentric viewing training are both recognized interventions to improve reading performance in individuals with vision loss secondary to age-related macular degeneration. Both are relatively expensive, however, either in the cost of the device or in the amount of time personnel need to provide training. In this randomized trial, we compared the effectiveness of these two interventions.

Methods

Participants with age-related macular degeneration and visual acuity between 6/48 (20/160) and 6/120 (20/400) first received basic low vision care, including optical devices. At the subsequent baseline visit, they undertook a battery of measures including logMAR visual acuity; reading speed and accuracy for text in 1.3M and 1M fonts; reading information on medicine bottles, utility bills, and food packages; the NEI-VFQ; the Geriatric Depression Scale; and a reading inventory questionnaire. They were then randomized to either obtaining a CCTV for home use or eccentric viewing training over the following six weeks.

Results

Recruitment was more difficult than expected for this population. Of 145 patients referred, 29 met the inclusion-exclusion criteria, 14 were willing to enroll, and 10 completed the trial. For the primary outcome (reading speed for 1.3M print), there was a significant improvement between baseline and outcome for the CCTV group (p = 0.005), but not for the eccentric viewing training group (p = 0.28), and the CCTV group showed significantly greater change (p = 0.04). There was a nonsignificant improvement in reading speed for 1M text and a decrease in the amount of time taken to read utility bill information in the CCTV group. There was a significant improvement in near visual acuity with current glasses with eccentric viewing training. The other measures did not reach statistical significance.

Discussion

Randomized clinical trials for low vision rehabilitation, particularly in the elderly population with vision loss, are challenging, but such trials are important for the allocation of resources. This trial showed early indications of more impact on reading performance from CCTV than eccentric viewing training.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ClinicalTrials.gov. (2017). Low vision study comparing EV training vs. CCTV for AMD rehabilitation (AMD). Retrieved from https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00971464

Crossland

M. D.

Culham

L. E.

Kabanarou

S. A.

, & Rubin

G. S.

(2005). Preferred retinal locus development in patients with macular disease. Ophthalmology, 112, 1579–1585.

Dougherty

B. E.

Martin

S. R.

Kelly

C. B.

Jones

L. A.

Raasch

T. W.

, & Bullimore

M. A.

(2009). Development of a battery of functional tests for low vision. Optometry and Vision Science, 86, 955–963.

Elliott

D. B.

Trukolo-Ilic

Strong

J. G.

Pace

Plotkin

, & Bevers

(1997). Demographic characteristics of the vision-disabled elderly. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 38, 2566–2575.

Fine

E. M.

, & Rubin

G. S.

(1999). Reading with simulated scotomas: Attending to the right is better than attending to the left. Vision Research, 39, 1039–1048.

Fletcher

D. C.

, & Schuchard

R. A.

(1997). Preferred retinal loci relationship to macular scotomas in a low-vision population. Ophthalmology, 104, 632–638.

Gaffney

A. J.

Margrain

T. H.

Bunce

C. V.

, & Binns

A. M.

(2014). How effective is eccentric viewing training? A systematic literature review. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 34, 427–437.

Goodrich

G. L.

, & Kirby

(2001). A comparison of patient reading performance and preference: Optical devices, handheld CCTV (Innoventions magni-cam), or stand-mounted CCTV (Optelec clearview or TSI genie). Optometry, 72, 519–528.

Goodrich

G. L.

Kirby

Wood

, & Peters

(2006). The reading behavior inventory: An outcome assessment tool. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 100, 164–168.

10.

Hamade

Hodge

W. G.

Rakibuz-Zaman

, & Malvankar-Mehta

M. S.

(2016). The effects of low-vision rehabilitation on reading speed and depression in age-related macular degeneration: A meta-analysis. Plos One, 11, 7, e0159254.

11.

Kasten

Haschke

Meinhold

, & Oertel-Verweyen

(2010). A computer program for training eccentric reading in persons with central scotoma. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 104, 303–311.

12.

Klein

Lee

K. E.

Gangnon

R. E.

, & Klein

B. E. K.

(2013). Incidence of visual impairment over a 20-year period: The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology, 120, 1210–1219.

13.

Leat

S. J.

(2016). Proposed model for integrated low-vision rehabilitation services in Canada. Optometry and Vision Science, 93, 77–84.

14.

Lovie-Kitchin

(2011). Reading with low vision: The impact of research on clinical management. Clinical and Experimental Optometry, 94, 121–132.

15.

Mangione

C. M.

Lee

P. P.

Gutierrez

P. R.

Spritzer

Berry

, & Hays

R. D.

(2001). Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. Archives of Ophthalmology, 119, 1050–1058.

16.

Nilsson

U. L.

(1990). Visual rehabilitation with and without educational training in the use of optical aids and residual vision. A prospective study of patients with advanced age-related macular degeneration. Clinical Vision Sciences, 6, 3–10.

17.

Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care. (2008). Assistive devices program. Retrieved from http://www.Health.Gov.on.ca/en/public/programs/adp/categories

18.

Owsley

McGwin

Jr. Lee

P. P.

Wasserman

, & Searcey

(2009). Characteristics of low-vision rehabilitation services in the United States. Archives of Ophthalmology, 127, 681–689.

19.

Peterson

R. C.

Wolffsohn

J. S.

Rubinstein

, & Lowe

(2003). Benefits of electronic vision enhancement systems (EVES) for the visually impaired. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 136, 1129–1135.

20.

Petre

K. L.

Hazel

C. A.

Fine

E. M.

, & Rubin

G. S.

(2000). Reading with eccentric fixation is faster in inferior visual field than in left visual field. Optometry and Vision Science, 77, 34–39.

21.

Quartilho

Simkiss

Zekite

Xing

Wormald

, & Bunce

(2016). Leading causes of certifiable visual loss in England and Wales during the year ending 31 March 2013. Eye (Basingstoke), 30, 602–607.

22.

Reeves

B. C.

Harper

R. A.

, & Russell

W. B.

(2004). Enhanced low vision rehabilitation for people with age related macular degeneration: A randomized controlled trial. The British Journal of Ophthalmology, 88, 1443–1449.

23.

Stelmack

J. A.

Massof

R. W.

, & Stelmack

T. R.

(2004). Is there a standard of care for eccentric viewing training? Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 41, 729–738.

24.

Stelmack

J. A.

Tang

X. C.

Reda

D. J.

Rinne

Mancil

R. M.

, & Massof

R. W.

(2008). Outcomes of the Veterans Affairs Low Vision Intervention Trial (LOVIT). Archives of Ophthalmology, 126, 608–617.

25.

Stelmack

J. A.

Tang

X. C.

Wei

, & Massof

R. W.

(2012). The effectiveness of low-vision rehabilitation in 2 cohorts derived from the Veterans Affairs Low Vision Intervention Trial. Archives of Ophthalmology, 130, 1162–1168.

26.

Verdina

Giacomelli

Sodi

Pennino

Paggini

Murro

Virgili

, & Menchini

(2013). Biofeed-back rehabilitation of eccentric fixation in patients with Stargardt disease. European Journal of Ophthalmology, 23, 723–731.

27.

Vukicevic

, & Fitzmaurice

(2005). Impact of eccentric viewing and magnification interventions on the performance of activities of daily living. International Congress Series, 1282, 544–548.

28.

Yesavage

J. A.

Brink

T. L.

Rose

T. L.

Lum

Huang

Adey

, & Leirer

V. O.

(1982). Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: A preliminary report. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 17, 37–49.