Al-MouthN., & Al-KhalifaH. S. (2015). The accessibility and usage of smartphones by Arab-speaking visually impaired people. International Journal of Pervasive Computing and Communications, 11, 418–435.
2.
AzenkotS., & LeeN. B. (2013). Exploring the use of speech input by blind people on mobile devices. Proceedings of the 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. doi: 10.1145/2513383.2513440
3.
BarlowD. H.NockM., & HersenM. (2009). Single-case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change (3rd ed.). New York: Allyn & Bacon.
4.
GabaV. H.DesaiD.DesaiA., & PandeyS. K. (2014). Brailler: Enabling the visually impaired to use smartphones. International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology, 4, 3605–3609.
5.
HatakeyamaT.WatanabeT.TakahashiK.DoiK., & FukudaA. (2015). Development of communication assistive technology for persons with deaf-blindness and physical limitation. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 217, 974–979.
6.
HrehaK., & SnowdonL. (2011). We all can call: Enhancing accessible cell phone usage for clients with spinal cord injury. Assistive Technology, 23, 76–80.
7.
KazdinA. E. (2011). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
8.
LancioniG. E.O'ReillyM. F.SinghN. N.SigafoosJ.BoccasiniA.La MartireM. L.PerilliV., & SpagnuoloC. (2016). Technology to support positive occupational engagement and communication in persons with multiple disabilities. International Journal on Disability and Human Development, 15, 111–116.
9.
LancioniG. E.O'ReillyM. F.SinghN. N.SigafoosJ.GreenV. A.OlivaD.AlbertiG., & CarrellaL. (2013). Two women with multiple disabilities communicate with distant partners via a special text messaging system. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 397–403.
10.
LancioniG. E.O'ReillyM. F.SinghN. N.SigafoosJ.OlivaD.SmaldoneA.La MartireM., … ChiricoM. (2011). Technology-assisted programs for promoting leisure or communication engagement in two persons with pervasive motor or multiple disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 6, 108–114.
11.
LancioniG. E.SinghN. N.O'ReillyM. F.GreenV. A.OlivaD.BuonocuntoF.Sacco, … Di NuovoS. (2012). Technology-based programs to support forms of leisure engagement and communication for persons with multiple disabilities: Two single-case studies. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 15, 209–218.
12.
LancioniG. E.SinghN. N.O'ReillyM. F.SigafoosJ.BoccasiniA.La MartireM. L., & LangR. (2014). Case studies of technology for adults with multiple disabilities to make telephone calls independently. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 119, 320–331.
13.
LenkerJ. A.HarrisF.TaugherM., & SmithR. O. (2013). Consumer perspectives on assistive technology outcomes. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 8, 373–380.
14.
MaciasC.PanchT.HicksY. M.ScolnickJ. S.WeeneD. L.öngürD., & CohenB. M. (2015). Using smartphone apps to promote psychiatric and physical well-being. Psychiatric Quarterly, 86, 505–519.
15.
McDougallJ.EvansJ., & BaldwinP. (2010). The importance of self-determination to perceived quality of life for youth and young adults with chronic conditions and disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 31, 252–260.
16.
MederA. M., & WegnerJ. R. (2015). iPads, mobile technologies, and communication applications: A survey of family wants, needs, and preferences. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 27–36.
17.
O'RourkeP.EkinsR.TimminsB.TimminsF.LongS., & CoyleE. (2014). Crucial design issues for special access technology: A Delphi study. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 9, 48–59.
18.
Rodriguez-SanchezM. C.Moreno-AlvarezM. A.MartinE.BorromeoS., & Hernandez-TamamesJ. A. (2014). Accessible smart-phones for blind users: A case study for a wayfinding system. Expert Systems with Applications, 41, 7210–7222.
StasollaF.PerilliV.Di LeoneA.DamianiR.AlbanoV.StellaA., & DamatoC. (2015). Technological aids to support choice strategies by three girls with Rett syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 36, 36–44.
21.
SutherlandD.van der MeerL.SigafoosJ.Mirfin-VeitchB.MilnerP.O'ReillyM. F.LancioniG. E., & MarschikP. B. (2014). Survey of AAC needs for adults with intellectual disability in New Zealand. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 26, 115–122.
22.
TaylorJ. L., & HodappR. M. (2012). Doing nothing: Adults with disabilities with no daily activities and their siblings. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 117, 67–79.