BanduraA. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology.52(1), 1–26.
2.
CervantesC. M., & PorrettaD. L. (2013). Impact of after-school programming on physical activity among adolescents with visual impairments. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 30(2), 127–146.
3.
GuoF.LiY.KankanhalliM. S., & BrownM. S. (2013, October). An evaluation of wearable activity monitoring devices. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM international workshop on personal data meets distributed multimedia (pp. 31–34). ACM.
4.
HaegeleJ. A., & PorrettaD. L. (2015). Physical activity and school-aged individuals with visual impairments: A literature review. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 32(2), 68–82. doi:10.1123/apaq.201–0110
5.
KratochwillT. R.HitchcockJ.HomerR. H.LevinJ. R.OdomS. L.RindskopfD. M., & ShadishW. R. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/wwc_scd.pdf
6.
KriemlerS.MeyerU.MartinE.Van SluijsE. M. F.AndersenL. B., & MartinB. W. (2011). Effects of school-based interventions on physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents: A review of reviews and systematic update. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 45(11), 923–930. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2011009086
7.
MotlR. W. (2007). Chapter 2: Theoretical models for understanding physical activity behavior among children and adolescents—Social cognitive theory and self-determination theory. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 26(4), 350–357.
8.
StevensE. C. (2006). Evaluation of a social cognitive theory–based adolescent physical activity intervention: Plan for exercise, plan for health. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.