Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Introduction

Constant time delay is an evidence-based practice to teach sight word recognition to students with a variety of disabilities. To date, two studies have documented its effectiveness for teaching braille.

Methods

Using a multiple-baseline design, we evaluated the effectiveness of constant time delay to teach highly motivating words to three beginning braille readers with developmental disabilities. Procedural variations included a pre-teaching and assessment tool, a higher criterion for mastery, an increased number of trials per session, and remediated instructional feedback.

Results

A functional relation was established for all three participants. Students reached mastery in four to 12 sessions in less than one hour of instruction. Although the number of correct responses decreased over time, long-term maintenance was demonstrated.

Discussion

Results suggest that constant time delay is a promising strategy for teaching highly motivating words to early braille readers. Replication is required to establish constant time delay as an evidence-based practice for braille literacy.

Implications for practitioners

Practitioners are encouraged to incorporate constant time delay into a comprehensive literacy program with opportunities to generalize word reading to other contexts.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ayres

, & Gast

D. L.

(2010). Dependent measures and measurement procedures. In Gast

(Ed.), Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences (pp. 129–165). New York: Routledge.

Brock

M. E.

, & Carter

E. W.

(2015). Effects of a professional development package to prepare special education paraprofessionals to implement evidence-based practice. The Journal of Special Education, 49(1), 39–51.

Browder

Ahlgrim-Delzell

Spooner

Mims

P. J.

, & Baker

J. N.

(2009). Using time delay to teach literacy to students with severe developmental disabilities. Exceptional Children, 75, 343–364.

Cook

B. G.

, & Cook

S. C.

(2013). Unraveling evidence-based practices in special education. The Journal of Special Education, 47(2), 71–82.

Ferrell

K. A.

(2006). Evidence-based practices for students with visual disabilities. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 28, 42–48.

Hooper

J. D.

Ivy

S. E.

, & Hatton

D. D.

(2014). Using time delay to teach automatic word recognition to braille students. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 108, 107–121.

Horner

R. H.

Carr

E. G.

Halle

McGee

Odom

, & Wolery

(2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–180.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, PL 108-466, 20 U. S. C. §1400, H. R. 1350 (2004).

Ivy

S. E.

, & Hooper

J. D.

(2015). Using constant time delay to teach braille and Nemeth code to students transitioning from print to braille. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 109, 343–358.

10.

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. §6301 et seq. (2002).

11.

Wormsley

D. P.

(2011). A theoretical rationale for using the individualized meaning-centered approach to braille literacy education with students who have mild to moderate cognitive disabilities. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 105, 145–156.