AbnerG. H., & LahmE. A. (2002). Implementation of assistive technology with students who are visually impaired: Teachers’ readiness. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 96, 98–105.
2.
AlperS., & RaharinirinaS. (2006). Assistive technology for individuals with disabilities: A review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Special Education Technology, 21(2), 47–64.
3.
AlperS.RyndakD. L., & SchlossC. N. (2001). Alternate assessment of students with disabilities in inclusive settings.Need-ham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
4.
BauschM. E., & AultM. J. (2008). Assistive technology implementation plan: A tool for improving outcomes. Teaching Exceptional Children, 41(1), 6–14.
5.
BauschM. E.QuinnB. S.ChungY.AultM. J., & BehrmannM. M. (2009). Assistive technology in the individualized education plan. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 22, 9–23.
6.
BeigelA. R. (2000). Assistive technology assessment: More than the device. Intervention in School and Clinic, 35(4), 237–243.
7.
DuhaneyL. M. G., & DuhaneyD. C. (2000). Assistive technology: Meeting the needs of learners with disabilities. International Journal of Instructional Media.27(4), 393–401.
8.
HobsonE. H. (1997). Forms and functions of formative assessment. Clearing House, 71, 68–70.
9.
HourcadeJ.ParetteH. P., & HuerM. (1997). Family and cultural alert! Considerations in assistive technology assessment. Teaching Exceptional Children, 30, 14–51.
10.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). (1999). 34 C.F.R. 300.
11.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEIA). (2004). Amendments to Public Law No. 108–446, §602, USC 1401. Retrieved from http://idea.ed.gov/download/statute.html
12.
KellyS. M. (2009). Use of assistive technology by students with visual impairments: Findings from a national survey. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 103, 470–480.
13.
KintschA., & DePaulaR. (2002). A framework for the adoption of assistive technology. In BodineC. (Ed.), Proceedings of the SWAAAC 2002: Supporting learning through assistive technology (pp. E3, 1–10). Winter Park, FL: Assistive Technology Partners.
14.
LeeH., & TempletonR. (2008). Ensuring equal access to technology: Providing assistive technology for students with disabilities. Theory into Practice, 47(3), 212–219. doi:10.1080/00405840802153874
15.
MarinoM. T.MarinoE. C., & ShawS. F. (2006). Making informed assistive technology decisions for students with high-incidence disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38(6), 18–25.
16.
PresleyI., & D'AndreaF. M. (2009). Assistive technology for students who are blind or visually impaired: A guide to assessment.New York: AFB Press.
17.
SchererM. J., & CushmanL. A. (2002). Determining the content for an interactive training programme and interpretive guidelines for the Assistive Technology Device Predisposition Assessment. Disability & Rehabilitation, 24(1-3), 126–130.
18.
SilvermanM. K.StratmanK. E., & SmithR. O. (2000). Measuring assistive technology outcomes in schools using functional assessment. Diagnostique, 25(4), 302–326.
19.
StigginsR. J. (2001). Student-involved classroom assessment (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
20.
WattsE. H.O'BrianM., & WojcikB. (2004). Four models of assistive technology consideration. Journal of Special Education Technology, 19(1), 43–56.
21.
WongM. E. (2014). Supporting pre-service educators in assistive technology integration: A curriculum model. In CombsD. (Ed.), New research on assistive technologies: Uses and limitations (pp. 97–115). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
22.
WongM. E., & CohenL. (2011). School, family and other influences on assistive technology use: Access and challenges for special school students with visual impairments in Singapore. British Journal of Visual Impairment.29(2), 130–144. doi:10.1177/0264619611402759