Challenges to obtaining quality academic accommodations for students with visual impairments in postsecondary education hinder accessibility and the success of such students. The limitations of current policies and practices intended to address the needs of students in Canada are examined and potential solutions are discussed. Further systemic changes are needed to improve the quality and timeliness of accommodations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgranM.HongS., & BlankenshipK. (2007). Promoting the self-determination of students with visual impairments: Reducing the gap between knowledge and practice. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 101(8), 453–464.
2.
ByrneB. (2014). Getting in and getting on? The experiences of young people with visual impairments and hearing impairments in third-level education. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 61(2), 119–133. doi:10.1080/1034912X.2014.905057
CarneyK.GinsbergS.LeeL.LiA.OrrA.ParksL., & SchulteK. (2007). Meeting the needs of students with disabilities in higher education: How well are we doing?The Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 73(4), 35–38.
5.
ColeR. A., & SlavinA. J. (2013). Use of a video assistive device in science: A case study. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 107(4), 311–316.
6.
CrosslandS.M. D.SilvaR., & MacedoA. F. (2014). Smartphone, tablet computer and e-reader use by people with vision impairment. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 34(5), 552–557. doi:10.1111/opo.12136
7.
DallasB.SprongM., & UptonT. D. (2014). Post-secondary faculty attitudes toward inclusive teaching strategies. The Journal of Rehabilitation, 80(2), 12–20.
8.
D'AndreaF. M. (2012). Preferences and practices among students who read braille and use assistive technology. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 106(10), 585–596.
9.
EdyburnD. L. (2009). Instructional design advances in special education technology. Exceptionality, 17(2), 63–65. doi:10.1080/09362830902805699
10.
FichtenC.AsuncionJ., & BarileM. (2009). Accessibility of e-learning and computer and information technologies for students with visual impairments in post-secondary education. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 103(9), 543–557.
11.
FrankH.McLindenM., & DouglasG (2014). Investigating the learning experiences of student physiotherapists with visual impairments: An exploratory study. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 32(3), 223–235. doi:10.1177/0264619614537813
12.
GetzelE. E. (2008). Addressing the persistence and retention of students with disabilities in higher education: Incorporating key strategies and supports on campus. Exceptionality, 16(4), 207–219. doi:10.1080/09362830802412216
GuyerC., & UzetaM. (2009). Assistive technology obligations for postsecondary education institutions. Journal of Access Services, 6(1-2), 12–35. doi:10.1080/15367960802286120
16.
HongS. (2012). An alternative option to dedicated braille notetakers for people with visual impairments: Universal technology for better access. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 106(10), 650–655.
17.
HornL., & BerktoldJ. (1999). Students with disabilities in postsecondary education: A profile of preparation, participation, and outcomes.Washington, DC: National Center of Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov
18.
HortonS., & SloanD. (2014). Accessibility in practice: A process-driven approach to accessibility. In LangdonP. M.LazarJ.HeylighenA., & DongH. (Eds.), Inclusive designing: Joining usability, accessibility, and inclusion (pp. 105–115). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-05095-9
19.
Human Resources and Skills Development Canada. (2009). 2009 federal disability report: Advancing the inclusion of people with disabilities (Cat. No.: HS61–1/2009E-PDF). Gatinequ, QC. Retrieved from www.hrsdc.gc.ca/publications
20.
IrvineD.ZemkeA.PusateriG.GerlachL.ChunR., & JayW. M. (2014). Tablet and smartphone accessibility features in low vision rehabilitation. Neuro-Ophthalmology, 38(2), 53–59. doi:10.3109/01658107.2013.874448
21.
KumarK. L., & WidemanM. (2013). Accessible by design: Applying UDL principles in a first-year undergraduate course. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 44(1), 125–147.
22.
MeyerA.RoseD. H., & GordonD. (2014). Universal design for learning: Theory and practice.Wakefield, MA: CAST.
23.
MullinsL., & PreydeM. (2013). The lived experience of students with an invisible disability at a Canadian university. Disability & Society, 28(2), 147–160. doi:10.1080/09687599.2012.752127
24.
MyersK. A., & BastianJ. J. (2010). Understanding communication preferences of college students with visual disabilities. Journal of College Student Development, 51(3), 265–278. doi:10.1353/csd.0.0129
OgilvieK. K., & EggletonA. (2011). Opening the door: Reducing barriers to post-secondary education in Canada. Ottawa, ON. Retrieved from www.senate-senat.ca/social.asp
27.
PetrieH.PowerC., & SwallowD. (2009). Students with disabilities in higher education: Challenges and tactile solutions. Art Libraries Journal, 34(2), 35–40.
28.
ReedM., & CurtisK. (2012). Experiences of students with visual impairments in Canadian higher education. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 106(7), 414–424. Retrieved from http://www.afb.org/afbpress/pubjvib.asp?DocID=jvib060704
RobinsonB. L., & LiebermanL. J. (2004). Effects of visual impairment, gender, and age on self-determination. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 98(6), 351–366.
31.
RoseD., & DaltonB. (2009). Learning to read in the digital age. Mind, Brain, and Education, 3(2), 74–83.
32.
RoseD. H.HasselbringT. S.StahlS., & ZabalaJ. (2005). Assistive technology and universal design for learning: Two sides of the same coin. In EdyburnD. L.HigginsK., & BooneR. (Eds.), Handbook of special education technology research and practice (pp. 507–518). Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design Inc.
33.
RyanJ. (2011). Access and participation in higher education of students with disabilities: Access to what?The Australian Educational Researcher, 38(1), 73–93. doi:10.1007/s13384-010-0002-8
34.
ScottS. S.McguireJ. M., & ShawS. F. (2003). Universal design for instruction: A new paradigm for adult instruction in post-secondary education. Remedial and Special Education, 24(6), 369–379. doi:10.1177/07419325030240060801
Statistics Canada. (2012). Postsecondary enrolments, by program type, credential type, age groups, registration status and sex (CANSIM Table 477-0033). Retrieved from http://www5.statcan.gc.ca/cansim/
37.
Statistics Canada. (2013). Disability in Canada: Initial findings from the Canadian Survey on Disability (Cat. No.: 89-654-X-No. 002). Retrieved from www.statcan.gc.ca
38.
WongM. E., & CohenL. (2011). School, family and other influences on assistive technology use: Access and challenges for students with visual impairment in Singapore. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 29(2), 130–144. doi:10.1177/0264619611402759
39.
ZebehazyK. T., & WiltonA. P. (2014). Straight from the source: Perceptions of students with visual impairments about graphic use. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 108(4), 275–287.
