Power,Effect Size,and Practical Significance: How the Reporting in Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness Articles Has Changed in the past 20 Years

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Psychological Association. (2001). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Baguley

(2009). Standardized or simple effect size: What should be reported? British Journal of Psychology, 100, 603–617.

Cohen

(1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65, 145–153.

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Cohen

(1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.

Fritz

Morris

, & Richler

(2012). Effect size estimates: Current use, calculations, and interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 2–18.

Henson

, & Smith

A. D.

(2000). State of the art in statistical significance and effect size reporting: A review of the APA task force report and current trends. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 33, 285–296.

Huck

(2008). Reading statistics and research (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

Keselman

Huberty

Lix

Olenjnik

Cribbie

Donahue

Kowalchuk

Lowman

Petoskey

Keselman

, & Levin

(1998). Statistical practices of educational researchers: An analysis of their ANOVA, MANOVA, and ANCOVA analyses. Review of Education Research, 68, 350–386.

10.

Kieffer

Reese

, & Thompson

(2001). Statistical techniques employed in AERJ and JCP articles from 1988 to 1997: A methodological review. Journal of Experimental Education, 69, 280–309.

11.

Lipsey

(1990). Design sensitivity: Statistical power for experimental research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

12.

Peng

Long

, & Abaci

(2012). Power analysis software for educational researchers. Journal of Experimental Education, 80, 113–136.

13.

Sedlmeier

, & Gigerenzer

(1989). Do studies of statistical power have an effect on the power of studies? Psychological Bulletin, 105, 309–316.

14.

Wright

(2010). Looking for power: The difficulties and possibilities of finding participants for braille research. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 104, 775–780.