Print to Braille: Preparation and Accuracy of Mathematics Materials in K-12 Education

Abstract

Introduction

This study analyzed the accuracy of 107 mathematics worksheets prepared for tactile learners. The mean number of errors was calculated, and we examined whether there was a significant difference in the level of accuracy based on National Library Service for the Blind and Physically Handicapped (NLS) certification or job role of participants.

Methods

The authors selected five work sheets representative of mathematics materials transcribed for K-12 students. After completing an online demographic survey, participants prepared at least one of the worksheets and completed an online transcription survey about how they prepared each worksheet.

Results

The majority of the 59 participants spent less than 30 minutes transcribing each worksheet, and the predominant method for production was the use of braille translation software. Overall, participants had a high level of accuracy on the literary braille portions of the worksheets. There was variability in the accuracy of the Nemeth elements, formatting, and tactile graphic labels across the transcriptions. Significant differences existed between the means of errors in formatting and literary braille according to NLS certification status and, to a lesser extent, job role. There was not a significant difference in the accuracy of Nemeth elements in the majority of the worksheets according to certification status or job role. There were no significant differences in the preparation of the worksheets based on primary production method.

Discussion

There was variability in how materials were prepared for tactile readers and in the quality of the transcriptions.

Implications for practitioners

Variation in how materials are presented to tactile readers, including the formatting of headings and directions, can affect the ease of scanning and reading of materials. Inconsistencies, omissions, and errors have the potential to impact the ability of readers to understand and access information.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Printing House for the Blind. (2008). Guide to designing tactile illustrations for children's books. Louisville, KY: Author.

American Printing House for the Blind. (n.d.). Nemeth code reference sheet for basic mathematics. Lexington, KY: Author.

Braille Authority of North America. (2011). Braille formats: Principles of print-to-braille transcription. Retrieved from http://www.brailleauthority.org/formats/2011manual-web/index.html

Braille Authority of North America. (2010). Guidelines and standards for tactile graphics. Retrieved from http://www.brailleauthority.org/tg/web-manual/index.html

Damm

M. A.

, & Risjord

(2008). NBA braille formats course. Rochester, NY: National Braille Association.

Laudenslager

(1972). Braille handbook for the Nemeth code of braille mathematics and scientific notation. Louisville, KY: American Printing House for the Blind.

Roberts

Krebs

B. M.

, & Taffet

(1978). An introduction to braille mathematics. Louisville, KY: American Printing House for the Blind.

Rosenblum

L. P.

, & Herzberg

(2011). Accuracy and techniques in the preparation of math materials for tactual learners. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 105(7), 402–413.

Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired. (2010). Braille transcriber Q&A. Retrieved from http://www.tsbvi.edu/national-agenda/1827-braille-transcriber-qaa

10.

Zebehazy

K. T.

, & Wilton

A. P.

(2014). Straight from the source: Perceptions of students with visual impairments about graphic use. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 108(4), 275–286.