Given mutual concerns of vocational rehabilitation and the Social Security Administration, our purpose was to evaluate the effect of current individual and economic factors on competitive employment for Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) beneficiaries with visual impairments in vocational rehabilitation.
Methods
Using fiscal year 2010 RSA-911 data on 4,478 SSDI beneficiaries whose vocational rehabilitation services had concluded, we conducted descriptive and multilevel analyses to determine which client and state or agency factors predicted competitive employment.
Results
Unemployment rate, gender, age, race, disability, severity of visual impairment, education, prior earnings, SSDI amount, and interactive effects of agency structure were significantly related to competitive employment.
Discussion
This research provided new knowledge of state or agency influences, risk factors, advantages, and compensatory effects of services in blind agencies, and underscored the importance of prior work experience in achieving competitive employment for SSDI-beneficiary consumers.
Implications for practitioners
Recommendations related to vocational rehabilitation services to SSDI beneficiaries, policy regarding agency structure, and future research are made.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BerryH. G., & CaplanL. (2010). Employment and earnings growth among transition-age Supplemental Security Income Program participants. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 21(3), 152–159.
2.
CavenaughB., GiesenJ., & PierceS. (2000). Rehabilitation of visually impaired persons in separate and general agencies. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 94(3), 133–145.
3.
CavenaughB. S. (2010). An update on services and outcomes of blind consumers served in separate and general/combined VR agencies. Prepared for the National Council of State Agencies for the Blind by The National Research and Training Center on Blindness and Low Vision, Mississippi State University.
4.
CavenaughB. S., GiesenJ. M., & SteinmanB. A. (2006). Contextual effects of race or ethnicity on acceptance for vocational rehabilitation of consumers who are legally blind. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 100, 7, 425–436.
5.
ChennS. (2000). A simple method for converting an odds ratio to effect size for use in meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 19, 3127–3131.
6.
GiesenJ. M. (2012). [Selected analyses of FY 2011 RSA-911 Case Service Report data]. Unpublished raw data.
7.
GiesenJ. M., & CavenaughB. S. (March, 2008). Needed specificity in disability research: Race/ethnicity and disability type. Presented at the 2008 Annual Meeting of the Southeastern Psychological Association, Charlotte, NC.
8.
GiesenJ. M., & CavenaughB. S. (2012). Transition-age youths with visual impairments in vocational rehabilitation: A new look at competitive outcomes and services. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 106(8), 475–487.
9.
HeckR. H., ThomasS. L., & TabataL. N. (2012). Multilevel modeling of categorical outcomes using IBM SPSS.New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
10.
HennesseyJ. C., & MullerL. (1995). The effect of vocational rehabilitation and work incentives on helping the disabled-worker beneficiary back to work. Social Security Bulletin, 58(1), 15–28.
11.
HosmerD. W., & LemeshowS. (2000). Applied logistic regression.New York: Wiley.
12.
KennedyJ., & OlneyM. F. (2006). Factors associated with workforce participation among SSDI beneficiaries. Journal of Rehabilitation, 72(4), 24–30.
13.
McDonnallM. (2011). Predictors of employment for youths with visual impairments: Findings from the second National Longitudinal Transition Study. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 105(8), 453–466.
14.
RaudenbushS. W., BrykA., & CongdonR. T. (2010). HLM 7.0 hierarchical linear and non-linear modeling [computer software].Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
15.
Rehabilitation Services Administration. (2008). Reporting manual for the case service report (RSA-911).Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
RobinsonW. S. (1950). Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review, 15(3), 351–357.
18.
RogersJ. B., BishopM., & CrystalR. M. (2005). Predicting rehabilitation outcome for Supplemental Security Income and Social Security Disability Income recipients: Implications for consideration with the Ticket to Work Program. Journal of Rehabilitation, 71(3), 5–10.
19.
StoddenR. A., DowrickP., GilmoreS., & GallowayL. M. (2001). A review of secondary school factors influencing post-school outcomes for youth with disabilities. Report from the National Center for the Study of Postsecondary Educational Supports. Retrieved from http://www.rrtc.hawaii.edu/documents/products/phase1/043-H01.pdf
U.S. Census Bureau. (2010b). Mean income in the past 12 months (in 2010 inflation-adjusted dollars): 2010 American Community Survey 1-year estimates. Retrieved from http://factfinder2.census.gov
22.
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2011). Unemployment rates for states annual average rankings year: 2010 [Table]. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/lau/lastrk10.htm
23.
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2007a). Vocational rehabilitation: Earnings increased for many SSA beneficiaries after completing VR services, but few earned enough to leave SSA's disability roll (GAO Publication No. 07-332). Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d07332.pdf
24.
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2007b). Vocational rehabilitation: Improved information and practices may enhance state agency earnings outcomes for SSA beneficiaries (GAO Publication No. 07-521). Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d07521.pdf
U.S. Social Security Administration. (2012a). Annual statistical report on the Social Security Disability Insurance program, 2011 (SSA publication no. 13-11827). Retrieved from http://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/statcomps/di_asr/index.html
