The objectives of the study reported here were to describe the physical and psychological health of persons with Usher syndrome Type II (USH2) and to explore any differences in terms of gender.
Methods
The participants were recruited from the Swedish Usher database. In the first step, 122 persons received the questionnaire by mail, and 96 (aged 18–84, with a mean age of 55, 53% of whom were female) agreed to participate. The Health on Equal Terms questionnaire was used, which covered such items as health, living conditions, and social relationships. Results for the participants with USH2 were compared to those of a reference group of 5,738 persons who were drawn from a random sample of the Swedish population retrieved from the Swedish Public Health Institute. The odds ratio (adjusted for gender and age), and its 95% confidence interval were calculated.
Results
The participants with USH2 reported that their physical and psychological health was significantly poorer than that of the Swedish reference group. They revealed major problems involving headache, fatigue, depression, suicidal thoughts, and suicide attempts. For the male participants, the psychological differences were even more marked than those of the male reference group.
Discussion
The identification of factors associated with physical and psychological health and well-being is important for the design of future rehabilitation strategies for people with USH2. Special focus must be placed on the psychological well-being of men with USH2.
Implications for practitioners
The management of rehabilitation services for persons with USH2 calls for interdisciplinary teamwork to provide adequate resources to cope with the physical and psychological health issues demonstrated in this study.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AfariN., & BuchwaldD. (2003). Chronic fatigue syndrome: A review. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 221–236.
2.
AxelssonA., & RingdahlA. (1989). Tinni-tus—A study of its prevalence and characteristics. British Journal of Audiology, 23, 53–62.
3.
BoströmG. (2008). Hälsa på lika villkor— Hälsa och livsvillkor för personer med funktionsnedsättning [Health on equal terms—Health and living conditions for persons with disability] (Report No. 2008: 17). Österund, Sweden: Statens Folkhäl-soinstitut (Swedish National Institute of Public Health).
4.
BoströmG., & NyqvistK. (2010). Objective and background of the questions in the national public health survey: Swedish National Institute of Public Health (Report No. 2010:02).Österund, Sweden: Statens Folkhälsoinstitut (Swedish National Institute of Public Health).
5.
BrembergS. (2008). Suicid—ett folkhälsop-erspektiv på prevention (Suicide—A public health perspective on prevention) Statens Folkhälsoinstitut (Swedish National Institute of Public Health).Österund, Sweden: Statens Folkhälsoinstitut (Swedish National Institute of Public Health).
6.
BrennanM., & BallyS. J. (2007). Psycho-social adaptations to dual sensory loss in middle and late adulthood. Trends in Amplification, 11(4), 281–300.
7.
Capella-McDonnallM. E. (2005). The effects of single and dual sensory loss on symptoms of depression in the elderly. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 20, 855–861.
8.
ChiaE.-M., MitchellP., RochtchinaE., ForanS., GoldingM., & WangJ. J. (2006). Association between vision and hearing impairments and their combined effects on quality of life. Archives of Ophthalmology, 124, 1465–1470.
9.
ChuhA., WongW., & ZawarV. (2006). The skin and the mind. Australian Family Physician, 35, 723–725.
10.
DanermarkB., & MöllerK. (2008). Deaf-blindness, ontological security, and social recognition. International Journal of Audiology, 47(Suppl. 2), 119–123.
11.
GroverS., FishmanG. A., AndersonR. J., AlexanderK. R., & DerlackiD. J. (1997). Rate of visual field loss in retinitis pigmentosa. Ophthalmology, 104, 460–465.
12.
HaradaS., NishiwakiY., MichikawaT., KikuchiY., IwasawaS., NakanoM. (2008). Gender difference in the relationships between vision and hearing impairments and negative well-being. Preventive Medicine, 47, 433–437.
13.
HartongD. T., BersonE., & DryjaT. P. (2006). Retinitis pigmentosa. The Lancet, 368(3549), 795–809.
14.
HenryJ. A., DennisK. C., & SchechterM. A. (2005). General review of tinnitus: Prevalence, mechanisms, effects and management. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 48, 1204–1235.
15.
IezzoniL. I. (2009). Public health goals for persons with disabilities: Looking ahead to 2020. Disability and Health Journal, 2, 111–115.
16.
KimberlingW. J., & MöllerC. (1995). Clinical and molecular genetics of Usher syndrome. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 6, 63–72.
17.
KremerH., van WijkE., MärkerT., Wol-frumU., & RoepmanR. (2006). Usher syndrome: Molecular links of pathogenesis, proteins and pathways. Human Molecular Genetics, 15, 262–270.
18.
LanganS. M., & WilliamsH. C. (2006). What causes worsening of eczema? A systematic review. British Journal of Dermatology, 155, 504–514.
19.
LeijendeckersJ. M., PenningsR. J. E., SnikA. F. M., & BosmanA. J. (2009). Audio-metric characteristics of USH2a patients. Audiology and Neuro-Otology, 14, 223–231.
20.
LewisG., & WesselyS. (1992). The epidemiology of fatigue: More questions than answers. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 46, 92–97.
21.
MannJ. J., ApterA., BertoloteJ., BeautraisJ., CurrierD., HaasA. (2005). Suicide prevention strategies: A systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Association, 294(16), 2064–2074.
22.
MargeM., & PasickR. (1988). Health promotion for persons with disabilities: Moving beyond rehabilitation. American Journal of Health Promotion, 2(4) 29–35.
23.
MillánJ. M., AllerE., JaijoT., Blanco-KellyF., Gimenez-PardoA., & AyosoC. (2011). An update on the genetics of Usher syndrome. Journal of Ophthalmology, 2011, 1–8.
24.
MinerI. D. (1995). Psychosocial implications of Usher syndrome, Type I, throughout the life cycle. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 89, 287–296.
25.
MinerI. D. (1997). People with Usher syndrome, Type II: Issues and adaptations. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 91, 579–589.
26.
MöllerC. (2003). Deafblindness: Living with sensory deprivation. The Lancet, 362(Suppl.), 46–47.
27.
MöllerK. (2003). Deafblindness: A challenge for assessment—Is the ICF a useful tool?International Journal of Audiology, 42(Suppl.), 140–142.
28.
MöllerK. (2008). Impact on participation and service for persons with deafblindness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Örebro, School of Health and Medical Science. Report No. 26, Swedish Institute for Disability Research, Österund, Sweden.
PenningsR. (2004). Hereditary deaf-blindness, clinical and genetic aspects. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
31.
ReamE., & RichardsonA. (1996). Fatigue: A concept analysis. International Journal Nursing Studies, 33, 519–529.
32.
RönnbergJ., & BorgE. (2001). A review and evaluation of research on the deaf-blind from perceptual, communicative, social and rehabilitative perspectives. Scandinavian Journal of Audiology, 30(2), 67–77.
33.
SadeghiM. (2005). Usher syndrome: Prevalence and phenotype-genotype correlations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Göteborg University, Department of Audiology, Göteborg. Sweden.
34.
SadeghiA. M., ErikssonK., KimberlingW. J., SjöstromA., & MöllerC. (2006). Longterm visual prognosis in Usher syndrome Types 1 and 2. Acta Ophthalmo-logica Scandinavica, 84, 537–544.
35.
SadeghiM., KimberlingW. J., TranebjœrgL., & MöllerC. (2004). The prevalence of Usher syndrome in Sweden: A nationwide epidemiological and clinical survey. Audiological Medicine, 2, 220–228.
36.
SchneiderJ. (2006). Becoming deafblind: Negotiating a place in a hostile world. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Sydney, Faculty of Health Sciences, Sydney, Australia.
