Dog guide users in Japan were mostly satisfied with and used their dogs frequently; however, they requested some improvements in training and in basic guiding work. The findings of the study suggest the need for further improvement of training methods, considering cultural factors and individual users’ needs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeckA. M., & MeyersN. M. (1996). Health enhancement and companion animal ownership. Annual Review of Public Health, 17, 247–257.
2.
GoddardM. E., & BeilharzR. G. (1982). Genetic and environmental factors affecting the suitability of dogs as guide dogs for the blind. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 62, 97–102.
3.
IshigamiT., & TokudaK. (2003). Change of understanding on guide dogs for the blind: Comparison of the results of surveys in 1992 and 2001. Bulletin of Disability Sciences, 27, 103–112. [in Japanese, with an English abstract]
4.
IshigamiT., & TokudaK. (2004). Educational activities about guide dogs for the blind conducted by guide-dog users in Japan. Asian Journal of Disable Sociology, 4, 9–17. [in Japanese, with an English abstract]
5.
JacksonJ. A., MurphyJ. P., DusoirT., DusoirH., MurdockA., & MorrisonE. (1994). Ophthalmic, health and social profile of guide dog owners in Northern Ireland. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 14, 371–377.
6.
Japan Pet Food Association. (2009). Dai 16kai Inuneko Shiikuritsu Zenkoku Chosa [The 16th National Survey on the Rate of Dogs and Cats Keeping].Tokyo: Author. Retrieved from http://www.petfood.or.jp/data/chart2009 [in Japanese]
7.
KodaN., & HigashiY. (2004). Opinions on accepting guide dogs in hospitals. Japanese Journal of Human Animal Relations, 14, 44–49. [in Japanese, with an English abstract]
8.
KodaN., & MatsunakaK. (2005). Unpleasantness about dogs in assistance dog users and the general public. Abstracts of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Kansai Psychological Association, 67. [in Japanese]
9.
KodaN., & NegayamaK. (2006). Unpleasantness toward bodily products of dogs in young and middle-aged adults. Abstracts of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Japan Society of Developmental Psychology, 338. [in Japanese]
10.
KodaN., & ShimojuS. (2008). Public knowledge of and attitudes toward accessibility of assistance dogs for physically impaired people in Japan. Asian Journal of Disable Sociology, 7, 74–85.
11.
LloydJ. K. F., La GrowS., StaffordK. J., & BudgeR. C. (2008a). The guide dog as a mobility aid. Part 1: Perceived effectiveness on travel performance. International Journal of Orientation & Mobility, 1, 17–33.
12.
LloydJ. K. F., La GrowS., StaffordK. J., & BudgeR. C. (2008b). The guide dog as a mobility aid. Part 2: Perceived changes to travel habits. International Journal of Orientation & Mobility, 1, 34–45.
13.
MatsunakaK., & KodaN. (2008a). Acceptance of dog guides and daily stress levels of dog guide users and nonusers. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 102, 295–304.
14.
MatsunakaK, & KodaN. (2008b). The level of public familiarity with the law concerning assistance dogs and acceptance of assistance dogs: The effect of knowledge about assistance dogs. Japanese Journal of Social Welfare, 49, 53–59. [in Japanese, with an English abstract]
15.
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (2006). Heisei 18nen Shintaishogaiji-sha Jittai Chosa Kekka [Results of the Survey on the Actual Situation of Persons with Physical Impairments in 2006].Tokyo: Author. Retrieved from http://www.e-stat.go.jp/SG1/estat/List.do?lid=000001059905 [in Japanese]
16.
National Federation of All Japan Guide Dog Training Institutions. (2009). Moudouken kunren kijunshuu wo kaitei [Revision of guide dog training standards]. Guide Dog Information, 3. [in Japanese]
17.
National Federation of All Japan Guide Dog Training Institutions. (2010). Nippon no moudouken shiyoushasuu [The number of guide dog users in Japan]. Guide Dog Information, 5. [in Japanese]
18.
Research Committee on Guide Dogs. (2000). Modokenni kansuru Chosa Kenkyu Hokokusho [Research reports on guide dogs].Tokyo: Nippon Foundation. [in Japanese]
19.
ScottJ. P., & BielfeltS. W. (1976). Analysis of the puppy testing program. In PfaffenbergerC. J., ScottJ. P., FullerJ. L., GinsburgB. E., & BielfeltS. W. (Eds.), Guide dogs for the blind: Their selection, development and training (pp. 39–76). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
20.
SteffensM. C., & BerglerR. (1998). Blind people and their dogs: An empirical study on changes in everyday life, in self-experience, and in communication. In WilsonC. C., & TurnerD. C. (Eds.), Companion animals in human health (pp. 149–157). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
WillisM. B. (1995). Genetic aspects of dog behaviour with particular reference to working ability. In SerpellJ. (Ed.), The domestic dog (pp. 52–64). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
22.
WilssonE., & SundgrenP. E. (1997). The use of a behaviour test for the selection of dogs for service and breeding: 1. Method of testing and evaluating test results in the adult dog, demands on different kinds of service dogs, sex and breed differences. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 53, 279–295.
