This article reports on a multiple–case study that found a relationship between the proximity of paraeducators and the interactions of students with visual impairments with teachers and sighted students in general education classrooms. More interactions were found with teachers and peers in the classrooms when paraeducators were physically distant from the students. The findings have implications for addressing the roles of and training for paraeducators.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Causton-TheoharisJ. N., & MalmgrenK. W. (2005). Increasing peer interactions for students with severe disabilities via paraprofessional training. Exceptional Children, 71, 431–444.
2.
CelesteM. (2007). Social skills intervention for a child who is blind. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 101, 521–533.
3.
D'AlluraT. (2002). Enhancing the social interaction skills of preschoolers with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 96, 576–584.
4.
DowningJ. E., RyndakD. L., & ClarkD. (2000). Paraeducators in inclusive classrooms: Their own perceptions. Remedial and Special Education, 21, 171–181.
5.
ErwinE. (1993). Social participation of young children with visual impairments in specialized and integrated environments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 87, 138–142.
6.
FrenchN. K. (2001). Supervising paraprofessionals: A survey of teacher practices. Journal of Special Education, 35, 41–53.
7.
GiangrecoM. F., & BroerS. M. (2005). Questionable utilization of paraprofessionals in inclusive schools: Are we addressing symptoms or causes?Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 20, 10–26.
8.
GiangrecoM. F., & DoyleM. B. (2002). Students with disabilities and paraprofessional supports: Benefits, balance, and Band-aids. Focus on Exceptional Children, 34, 1–12.
9.
GiangrecoM. F., EdelmanS. W., BroerS. M., & DoyleM. B. (2001). Paraprofessional support of students with disabilities: Literature from the past decade. Exceptional Children, 68, 45–63.
10.
GiangrecoM. F., EdelmanS. W., LuiselliT. E., & MacFarlandS. Z. (1997). Helping or hovering? Effects of instructional assistant proximity on students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 64, 7–18.
HarrisB. A. (2009). Paraprofessional proximity and decision making during interactions of students with visual impairments. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson.
13.
HuebnerK. M., Merk-AdamB., StrykerD., & WolffeK. (2004). The national agenda for the education of children and youths with visual impairments, including those with multiple disabilities, revised.New York:American Foundation for the Blind.
14.
Jindal-SnapeD. (2004). Generalization and maintenance of social skills of children with visual impairments: Self-evaluation and the role of feedback. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 98, 470–483.
15.
KazdinA. E. (1982). Single-case research design: Methods for clinical and applied settings.New York:Oxford University Press.
16.
KekelisL. S., & SacksS. Z. (1992). The effects of visual impairment on children's social interactions in general education programs. In SacksS. Z., KekelisL. S., & Gaylord-RossR. J. (Eds.), The development of social skills by blind and visually impaired students (pp. 59–82). New York:American Foundation for the Blind.
17.
LewisS., & McKenzieA. R. (2009). Knowledge and skills for teachers of students with visual impairments supervising the work of paraeducators. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 103, 481–494.
18.
LewisS., & McKenzieA. R. (2010). The competencies, roles, supervision, and training needs of paraeducators working with students with visual impairments in local and residential schools. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 104, 464–477.
19.
MarksS. U., SchraderC., & LevineM. (1999). Paraeducator experiences in inclusive settings: Helping, hovering, or holding their own?Exceptional Children, 65, 315–328.
20.
McKenzieA. R., & LewisS. (2008). The role and training of paraprofessionals who work with students who are visually impaired. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 102, 459–471.
21.
MerriamS. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
22.
MinondoS., MeyerL. H., & XinJ. F. (2001). The role and responsibilities of teaching assistants in inclusive education: What's appropriate?Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 26, 114–119.
23.
RiggsC. G., & MuellerP. H. (2001). Employment and utilization of paraeducators in inclusive settings. Journal of Special Education, 35, 54–62.
24.
RussottiJ., & ShawR. (2001). In-service training for teaching assistants and others who work with students with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 95, 483–487.
25.
SacksS. Z., & WolffeK. (1998). Lifestyles of adolescents with visual impairments: An ethnographic analysis. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 92, 7–17.
26.
WertsM., WoleryM., SnyderE., & CaldwellN. (1996). Teachers' perceptions of the supports critical to the success of inclusion programs. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 21, 9–21.
27.
WertsM. G., ZigmondN., & LeeperD. C. (2001). Paraprofessional proximity and academic engagement: Students with disabilities in primary aged classrooms. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 36, 424–440.
28.
WolffeK., & SacksS. Z. (1997). The lifestyles of blind, low vision, and sighted youths: A quantitative comparison. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 91, 245–257.
29.
YinR. K. (1989). Case study research: Design and methods.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
30.
YinR. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
