The relationship between perceived social support and multiple indicators of well-being in adults with visual impairments was investigated. The results included significant correlation of social support and depressive symptoms, satisfaction with life, as well as with physical, psychological, economic, family, and social well-being. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndresenE. M., MalmgrenJ. A., CarterW. B., & PatrickD. L. (1994). Screening for depression in well older adults: Evaluation of a short form of the CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale). American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 10, 77–84.
2.
BishopM. (2005). Quality of life and psychosocial adaptation to chronic illness and acquired disability: A conceptual and theoretical synthesis. Journal of Rehabilitation, 71(2), 5–13.
3.
BishopM., ChapinM., & MillerS. M. (2008). Quality of life assessment in the measurement of rehabilitation outcomes. Journal of Rehabilitation, 24, 45–54.
4.
BishopM., SmedemaS. M., & LeeE. J. (2009). Outcome measurement and adjustment to chronic illness and disability: Quality of life. In ChanF., CardosoE., & ChronisterJ. (Eds.), Understanding psychosocial adjustment to chronic illness and disability: A handbook for evidence-based practitioners in rehabilitation (pp. 521–528). New York: Springer.
5.
BoernerK., & CimarolliV. R. (2005). Optimizing rehabilitation for adults with visual impairment: Attention to life goals and their links to well-being. Clinical Rehabilitation, 19, 790–798.
6.
BoernerK., WangS., & CimarolliV. R. (2006). The impact of functional loss: Nature and implications of life changes. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 11, 265–287.
7.
CiavarellaM., CorriganP. W., HilburgerJ., LamC. S., & ChanF. (2004). Counseling intervention and skill training for people with psychiatric disabilities. In ChanF., BervenN. L., & ThomasK. R. (Eds.), Counseling theories and techniques for rehabilitation health professionals (pp. 342–362). New York: Springer.
8.
CimarolliV. R. (2006). Perceived overprotection and distress in adults with visual impairment. Rehabilitation Psychology, 51, 338–345.
9.
CimarolliV. R., & BoernerK. (2005). Social support and well-being in adults who are visually impaired. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 99, 521–534.
10.
CimarolliV. R., ReinhardtJ. P., & HorowitzA. (2006). Perceived overprotection: Support gone bad?Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 61B, S18–S23.
11.
CimarolliV. R., & WangS. (2006). Differences in social support among employed and unemployed adults who are visually impaired. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 100, 545–556.
12.
CumminsR. A. (2005). Moving from the quality of life concept to a theory. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49, 699–706.
13.
DienerE., EmmonsR. A., LarsenR. J., & GriffenS. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.
14.
DijkersM. (1997). Measuring quality of life. In FuhrerM. J. (Ed.), Assessing medical rehabilitation practices: The promise of outcomes research (pp. 153–180). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brooks.
15.
FerrinJ. M. (2002). Psychometric validation of the Multidimensional Acceptance of Loss Scale. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Department of Rehabilitation Psychology and Special Education, University of Wisconsin–Madison.
16.
HerreroJ., & MenesesJ. (2006). Short Web-based versions of the Perceived Stress (PSS) and Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CESD) Scales: A comparison to pencil and paper responses among internet users. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 830–846.
17.
LivnehH. (2001). Psychosocial adaptation to chronic illness and disability: A conceptual framework. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 44, 151–160.
18.
LubbenJ. E., BlozikE., GillmannG., IliffeS., von Renteln KruseW., BeckJ. C., & StuckA. R. (2006). Performance of an abbreviated version of the Lubben Social Network Scale among three European community-dwelling older adult populations. The Gerontologist, 46, 503–513.
19.
LubbenJ. E., & GirondaM. W. (2003). Centrality of social ties to the health and well-being of older adults. In BerkmanB., & HarooytanL. K. (Eds.), Social work and health care in an aging world (pp. 319–350). New York: Springer.
20.
McIlvaneJ. M., & ReinhardtJ. P. (2001). Interactive effect of support from family and friends in visually impaired elders. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 56B, P374–P382.
21.
MillerS. M., & ChanF. (2008). Predictors of life satisfaction in individuals with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 52, 1039–1047.
22.
MueserK. T., DrakeR. E., & BondG. R. (1997). Recent advances in psychiatric rehabilitation for patients with severe mental illness. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 5, 123–137.
23.
QueryJ. L. J., & WrightK. (2003). Assessing communication competence in an online study: Toward informing subsequent interventions among older adults with cancer, their lay caregivers, and peers. Health Communication, 15, 203–218.
24.
ReinhardtJ. P. (1996). The importance of friendship and family support in adaptation to chronic vision impairment. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 51, 268–278.
25.
RoesslerR. T. (1990). A quality of life perspective on rehabilitation counseling. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 34(2), 82–90.
26.
RubinS. E., ChanF., BishopM., & MillerS. M. (2003). Psychometric validation of the Sense of Well-Being Inventory for program evaluation in rehabilitation. The Rehabilitation Professional, 11(2), 54–59.
27.
SmedemaS. M., & McKenzieA. R. (2010). The relationship among frequency and type of Internet use, perceived social support, and sense of well-being in individuals with visual impairments. Disability and Rehabilitation, 32, 317–325.
28.
WHOQOL Group. (1995). The World Health Organization quality of life assessment: Position paper from the World Health Organization. Social Science & Medicine, 41, 1403–1409.
WrightK. B. (2005). Researching Internet-based populations: Advantages and disadvantages of online survey research, online questionnaire authoring software packages, and web survey services. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3). Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue3/wright.html
