This article reports on a study of the adaptation of parents with children with visual impairment in South Africa. The results showed that familial values (such as attitude toward the disability, religious faith, and familial closeness) permit a process of inclusion (through the use of resources and acceptance of help) and the development of a sense of accomplishment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BambaraJ. K., WadleyV., OwsleyC., MartinR. C., PorterC., & DreerL. E. (2009). Family functioning and low vision: A systematic review. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 103, 137–149.
2.
Bradbury-JonesC. (2007). Enhancing rigor in qualitative health research: Exploring subjectivity through Peshkin's eyes. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 59, 290–298.
3.
De HaanL., HawleyD. R., & DealJ. E. (2002). Operationalising family resilience: A methodological strategy. American Journal of Family Therapy, 30, 275–291.
4.
De SteiguerP. B., ErinJ. N., ToporI. L., & RosenblumL. P. (2008). The experiences of parents of students with visual impairments who are professionals in the field of visual impairment. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 102, 16–27.
5.
GlaserB. (2005). The grounded theory perspective III: Theoretical coding.Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
6.
GlaserB., & StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies of qualitative research.New York: Aldine de Gruiter.
7.
HerringJ. (2006). Adjusting to your child's visual impairment. In HolbrookM. C. (Ed.), Children with visual impairments: A parents’ guide (pp. 4–72). Bethesda, MD: Woodbine House.
8.
HodappR. M. (1998). Development and disabilities.Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
LeyserY., HeinzeA., & KappermanG. (1996). Stress and adaptation in families of children with visual disabilities. Families in Society, 77, 240–249.
11.
McCubbinM., & McCubbinH. (1996). Resiliency in families: A conceptual model of family adjustment and adaptation in response to stress and crisis. In McCubbinH., ThompsonA., & McCubbinM. (Eds.), Family assessment, resiliency, coping and adaptation—Inventories for research and practice (pp. 1–64). Madison: University of Wisconsin.
12.
McGoldrickM., & CarterB. (2003). The family life cycle. In WalshF. (Ed.), Normal family processes: Growing diversity and complexity (pp. 375–395). New York: Guilford Press.
13.
NiemannS., & JacobN. (2000). Helping children who are blind: Family and community support for children with vision problems.Berkeley, CA: Hesperian Foundation.
14.
OlsonD. H., & GorallD. M. (2003). Circumplex model of marital and family systems. In WalshF. (Ed.), Normal family processes: Growing diversity and complexity (pp. 514–541). New York: Guilford Press.
15.
ShentoA. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75.
16.
SmithS. (2006). Encouraging the use of reflexivity in the writing up of qualitative research. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 13, 209–213.
17.
StraussA., & CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
UlsterA. A., & AntleB. J. (2005). In the darkness there can be light: A family's adaptation to a child's blindness. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 99, 209–218.
19.
WalshF. (2002). A family resilience framework: Innovative practice applications. Family Relations, 51, 130–137.
20.
WalshF. (2003). Family resilience strengths forged through adversity. In WalshF. (Ed.), Normal family processes: Growing diversity and complexity (pp. 399–420). New York: Guilford Press.
YauM. K., & Li-TsangC. W. P. (1999). Adjustment and adaptation in parents of children with developmental disability in two-parent families: A review of the characteristics and attributes. British Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 45(88), 38–51.
