A new means of measuring the movement properties of the braille-reading finger is described and exemplified in an experiment in which experienced readers of braille encountered sentences comprised of keywords in which word and orthographic frequencies were manipulated. These new data are considered in theoretical and practical terms.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BalotaD. A., YapM. J., CorteseM. J., HutchisonK. A., KesslerB., LoftisB., NeelyJ. H., NelsonD. L., SimpsonG. B., & TreimanR. (2007). The English Lexicon Project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445–459.
2.
BertelsonP. (1995). Language by touch: The case of braille reading. In de GelderB., & MoraisJ. (Eds.), Speech and reading: A comparative approach. (pp. 91–108). Oxford, England: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
BertelsonP., & MoustyP. (1989). Simultaneous reading of braille with the two hands: Reply to Millar (1987). Cortex, 25, 495–498.
4.
BertelsonP., MoustyP., & D'AlimonteG. (1985). A study of braille reading: 2. Patterns of hand activity in one-handed and two-handed reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 235–256.
5.
BreidegardB., ErikssonY., FelleniusK., JönssonB., HolmqvistK., & StrömqvistS. (2008). Enlightened: The art of finger reading. Studia Linguistica, 62, 249–260.
6.
ConnorC. E., & JohnsonK. O. (1992). Neural coding of tactile texture: Comparison of spatial and temporal mechanisms for roughness perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 12, 3414–3426.
7.
DanemanM. (1988). How reading braille is both like and unlike reading print. Memory & Cognition, 16, 497–504.
8.
DavidsonP. W., Wiles-KettenmannM., HaberR. N., & AppelleS. (1980). Relationship between hand movements, reading competence and passage difficulty in braille reading. Neuropsychologia, 18, 629–635.
9.
FoulkeE. (1991). Braille. In HellerM. A., & SchiffW. (Eds.), The psychology of touch. (pp. 219–233). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
HughesB., & JanssonG. (1994). Texture perception via active touch. Human Movement Science, 13, 301–333.
11.
HughesB., Van GemmertA. W. A., & StelmachG. E. (2009). The intermittency of the braille reading finger velocities. In VinterA., & VelayJ. L. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th Conference of the International Graphonomics Society (pp. 190–93). Nijmegen, the Netherlands: IGS.
12.
HughesB., Van GemmertA. W. A., & StelmachG. E. (in press). Linguistic and perceptual-motor contributions to the kinematic properties of the braille reading finger. Human Movement Science. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2010.05.005
13.
KruegerL. E. (1982). A word-superiority effect with print and braille characters. Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 345–352.
14.
KuceraH., & FrancisW. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English.Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
15.
KusajimaT. (1974). Visual reading and braille reading: An experimental investigation of the physiology and psychology of tactual reading.New York: American Foundation for the Blind.
16.
LundK., & BurgessC. (1996). Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 28, 203–208.
17.
MillarS. (1987). The perceptual “window” in two-handed braille: Do the left and right hands process text simultaneously?Cortex, 23, 111–122.
18.
MillarS. (1997). Reading by touch.London: Routledge.
19.
NobletA., RidelaireH., & SylinG. (1985). Equipment for study of operating processes in braille reading. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 17, 107–113.
20.
RaynerK. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372–422.
21.
RaynerK., FoormanB. R., PerfettiC. A., PesetskyD., & SeidenbergM. S. (2001). How psychological sciences informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2, 31–74.
22.
ReichleE. D., RaynerK., & PollatsekA. (2003). The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 445–526.
23.
WhiteS. J. (2008). Eye movement control during reading: Effects of word frequency and orthographic familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 205–223.
