Truncated domes on curb ramps benefit travelers with visual impairments. However, concerns associated with the safety and negotiability of such detectable warnings for other travelers have resulted in much controversy. The findings of the study presented here indicate that detectable warnings did not adversely affect the negotiability of ramps by the 21 participants who ambulated by wheelchairs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG) for buildings and facilities (Appendix A to Part 36, Title III). (Federal Register, 1991, July 26). Washington DC: Architectural & Transportation Barriers Compliance Board and the Department of Education.
2.
BarlowJ., & BentzenB. (1994). Cues blind travelers use to detect streets: Final report.Cambridge, MA: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration, and Volpe National Transportation Systems Center.
3.
BentzenB. L., BarlowJ., & TaborL. (2000). Detectable warnings: Synthesis of U.S. and international practice.Washington, DC: U.S. Access Board.
4.
BentzenB. L., NolinT. L., EastonR. D., DesmaraisL., & MitchellP. A. (1994). Detectable warnings: Detectability by individuals with visual impairments, and safety and negotiability of slopes for persons with physical impairments (Final report DOT-VNTSC-FTA-94-4 and FTA-MA-06-0201-94-2). Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service. Retrieved from http://www.accessforblind.org/publications/USDOT/DOT-VNTSC-FTA-94-4.pdf
5.
Florida pedestrian planning and design handbook. (1999). Chapel Hill: Highway Safety Research Center, University of North Carolina–Chapel Hill & Tallahassee, Florida Department of Education.
6.
HaugerJ. S., RigbyJ. C., SafewrightM. P., & McAuleyW. J. (1996). Detectable warnings surfaces at curb ramps. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 90, 512–525.
7.
MitchellM. (1988). Pathfinder tactile tile demonstration test project civic/center station: Final report.Miami, FL: Metro-Dade Transit Agency, Office of Transit Safety and Assurance.
8.
O'LearyA. A., LockwoodR., & TaylorR. V. (1995). Evaluation of detectable warning surfaces for sidewalk curb ramps. Transportation Research Record (No. 1538), 47–53.
9.
PeckA. F., & BentzenB. L. (1987). Tactile warnings to promote safety in the vicinity of transit platform edges (Report UMTA-MA-06-0120-87-1). Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service. Retrieved from http://www.accessforblind.org/publications/USDOT/DOT-TSC-UMTA-87-11.pdf
10.
Public Rights-of-Way Access Advisory Committee. (2001). Building a true community: Final report.Washington, DC: U.S. Access Board.
11.
Public Rights-of-Way Access Advisory Committee. (2005). Revised draft guidelines for accessible-public-rights-of-way.Washington, DC: U.S. Access Board. Retrieved from http://www.access-board.gov/prowac/draft.htm
12.
StrattonP. A. (2001, February). Universal design: An all-inclusive approach. The Construction Specifier, 27–32.
