This article reports on a survey of 165 teachers of students with visual impairments in Texas to examine their perceptions of their knowledge of assistive technology. The results showed that they had significant deficits in knowledge in 55 (74.32%) of the 74 assistive technology competencies that were examined and that 57.5% of them lacked adequate confidence about teaching assistive technology to students.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbnerG. H., & LahmE. A. (2002). Implementation of assistive technology with students who are visually impaired: Teacher readiness. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 96, 98–105.
2.
CooperH. L., & NicholsS. K. (2007). Technology and early braille literacy: Using the Mountbatten Pro Brailler in primary-grade classrooms. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 101, 22–31.
EdwardsB. J., & LewisS. (1998). The use of technology in programs for students with visual impairments in Florida. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 92, 302–312.
5.
GerberE. (2003). The benefits of and barriers to computer use for individuals who are visually impaired. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 97, 21–28.
6.
KappermanG., StickenJ., & HeinzeT. (2002). Survey of the use of assistive technology by Illinois students who are visually impaired. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 96, 106–108.
7.
KellyS. M. (2009). Use of assistive technology by students with visual impairments: Findings from a national survey. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 103, 470–480.
8.
LeeY., & VegaL. A. (2005). Perceived knowledge, attitudes, and challenges of AT use in special education. Journal of Special Education Technology, 20, 60–62.
9.
OsborneA., & RussoC. (2007). Special education and the law: A guide for practitioners.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
10.
ParkerS., BuckleyW., TruesdellA., RiggioM., CollinsM., & BoardmanB. (1990). Barriers to the use of assistive technology with children: A survey. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 84, 532–533.
11.
PogrundR. L., & WibbenmeyerK. A. (2008). Interpreting the meaning of the terms certified and highly qualified for teachers of students with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 102, 5–15.
12.
SmithD. W., & KelleyP. A. (2007). A survey of the integration of assistive technology knowledge into teacher preparation programs for individuals with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 101, 429–433.
13.
SmithD. W., KelleyP., MaushakN. J., Griffin-ShirleyN., & LanW. Y. (2009). Assistive technology competencies for teachers of students with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 103, 457–469.
14.
SokalR. R., & RohlfF. J. (1995). Biometry: The principles and practice of statistics in biological research (3rd ed.). New York: Freeman.
15.
StrobelW., FossaJ., ArthanatS., & BraceJ. (2006). Technology for access to text and graphics for people with visual impairments and blindness in vocational settings. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 24, 87–95.
