Fourteen students with visual impairments in Grades 5–12 participated in the field-testing of AnimalWatch-VI-Beta. This computer program delivered 12 prealgebra math problems and hints through a self-voicing audio feature. The students provided feedback about how the computer program can be improved and expanded to make it accessible to all users.
BealC. R., AdamsN., & CohenP. R. (2010). Reading proficiency and mathematics problem solving by English learners. Urban Education, 44, 58–74.
3.
BealC. R., ArroyoI., CohenP. R., & WoolfB. P. (2010). Evaluation of Animal-Watch: An intelligent tutoring system for arithmetic and fractions. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 9(1), 64–77.
4.
BealC. R., & ShawE. (2009). An online math problem solving system for middle school students who are blind. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5, 630–638.
5.
California State Board of Education (1997, December). Mathematics content standards for California public schools: Kindergarten through grade twelve.Sacramento: Author. Retrieved from http://www.cusd.org/state_standards/mathematics.pdf
6.
CavenaughB. S. (2006). [Analysis of Rehabilitation Services Administration 911 national data, fiscal year 2004]. Unpublished raw data.
7.
ChampionR. (1976–77). The talking calculator used with blind users. Education of the Visually Handicapped, 8, 102–106.
8.
CohenP. R., & BealC. R. (2009). Temporal data mining for educational applications. International Journal of Software and Informatics, 3, 31–46.
9.
CrispG., NoraA., & TaggartA. (2009). Student characteristics, pre-college, college, and environmental factors as predictors of majoring in and earning a STEM degree: An analysis of students attending a Hispanic-serving institution. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 924–942.
10.
DickT., & KubiakE. (1997). Issues and aids for teaching mathematics to the blind. Mathematics Teacher, 90, 344–349.
11.
FerrellK. A., BuettelM., SebaldA. M., & PearsonR. (2006). Mathematics research analysis.Louisville, KY: American Printing House for the Blind.
12.
HansenE. G., ShuteV. J., & LandauS. (2010). An assessment-for-learning system in mathematics for individuals with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 104, 275–286.
13.
KaylorM. (2010). Universal design and technology for students with disabilities in STEM fields. InProceedings of the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2010 (pp. 2755–2759). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
14.
KintschW., & GreenoJ. G. (1985). Understanding and solving word arithmetic problems. Psychological Review, 92, 109–129.
15.
KoedingerK. R., & NathanM. J. (2004). The real story behind story problems: Effects of representations on quantitative reasoning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 129–164.
16.
LandauS., RussellM., GourgeyK., ErinJ. N., & CowanJ. (2003). Use of the Talking Tactile Tablet in mathematics testing. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 97, 85–97.
17.
MangoldS. S. (2003). Speech-assisted learning provides unique braille instruction. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 97, 256–261.
18.
MartinD. B. (2000). Mathematics success and failure among African-American youth.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
McDonnallM., GeisenJ. M., & CavenaughB. (2009, June). School climate, support and mathematics achievement for students with visual impairments. Poster presented at the annual Institute of Education Sciences Research Conference, Washington, DC.
20.
MieleJ. A., & Van SchaackA. (2009, June). Audiotactile graphics using Smartpen technology. Paper presented at the National Science Foundation Joint Annual Meeting (JAM), Washington, DC.
21.
MosesR. P., & CobbC. E. (2001). Radical equations: Civil rights from Mississippi to the Algebra Project.Boston: Beacon Press.
22.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics.Reston, VA: Author.
23.
National Mathematics Advisory Panel (2008). Foundations for success: Report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
24.
National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics (2009, January). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2009 (NSF 09-305).Arlington, VA: Author.
25.
OsborneJ. W. (2007). Linking stereotype threat and anxiety: Physiological and cognitive evidence. Educational Psychology, 27, 135–154.
26.
PresleyI., & D'AndreaF. M. (2008). Assistive technology for students who are blind or visually impaired.New York: AFB Press.
27.
RoyerJ. M., TronskyL. N., ChanY., JacksonS. J., & MerchantH. (1999). Math fact retrieval as the cognitive mechanism underlying gender differences in math test performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 181–266.
28.
SengeJ. C. (1998, March). Building a bridge to college: Success in K12. Paper presented at the Annual International Technology and Persons with Disabilities Conference at California State University, Northridge (C-SUN), Northridge, CA.
29.
SwansonH. L., CooneyJ. B., & BrockS. (1993). The influence of working memory and classification ability on children's word problem solution. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 55, 374–395.
30.
SwansonH. L., & JermanO. (2006). Math disabilities: A selective meta-analysis of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 76, 249–274.
31.
SwellerJ. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257–286.
32.
TysonW., LeeR., BormanK. M., & HansonM. A. (2007). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) pathways: High school science and math coursework and postsecondary degree attainment. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 12, 243–270.
33.
WalczykJ. J., & Griffith-RossD. A. (2006). Time restriction and the linkage between subcomponent efficiency and algebraic inequality success. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 617–627.
