This article introduces a recently developed haptic glove system and describes how the participants used a video game that was purposely designed to train them in skills that are needed for the efficient use of the haptic glove. Assessed skills included speed, efficiency, embodied skill, and engagement. The findings and implications for future research are discussed.
BrodskyW. (2001). The effects of music tempo on simulated driving performance and vehicular control. Transportation Research Part F: Psychology and Behavior, 4, 219–241.
3.
ColwellC., PetrieH., KornbrotD., Hard-wickA., & FurnerS. (1998). Haptic virtual reality for blind computer users. Proceedings of the ASSETS 1998 Conference, 3, 92–99. doi: 10.1145/274497.274515
4.
DourishP. (2001). Where the action is: The foundations of embodied interaction.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5.
KaholK., & PanchanathanS. (2008). Neuro-cognitively inspired haptic user interfaces. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 37, 15–38.
6.
KarshmerA. I., & BledsoeC. (2002). Access to mathematics by blind students— Introduction to the special thematic session. In MeisenbergerK., KlausJ., & ZaglerW. (Eds.), Computers Helping People with Special Needs: Eighth International Conference Proceedings (pp. 471–476). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
7.
LahavO., & MioduserD. (2008). Haptic-feedback support for cognitive mapping of unknown spaces by people who are blind. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66, 23–25.
8.
LaVentureS. (2003). The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): Past and present. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 97, 517–518.
9.
LeeH., & TempletonR. (2008). Ensuring equal access to technology: Providing assistive technology for students with disabilities. Theory into Practice, 47, 212–219.
10.
OkoloC. M., & BouckE. C. (2007). Research about assistive technology: 2000–2006. What have we learned?Journal of Special Education Technology, 22(3), 19–33.
11.
OliveiraF., & QuekF. (2008). A multimodal communication with a haptic glove: On the fusion of speech and deictic over a raised line drawing.Proceedings of the First International Conference on Pervasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments, Athens, Greece, 1–8.
12.
ParenteP., & BishopG. (2003, March). BATS: The Blind Audio Tactile Mapping System. Paper presented at the 41st Annual Association for Computing Machinery Southeastern Conference. Savannah, GA.
13.
PresleyI., & D'AndreaF. M. (2008). Assistive technology for students who are blind or visually impaired: A guide to assessment.New York: AFB Press.
14.
QuekF., McNeillD., & OliveiraF. (2006). Enabling multimodal communications for enhancing the ability of learning for the visually impaired. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (pp. 326–332). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
15.
SanchezJ., & LumbrerasM. (1999). Virtual environment interaction through 3D audio by blind children. Journal of Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 2, 101–111.
16.
SemwalS. K., & Evans-KampD. L. (2000). Virtual environments for visually impaired. In HeudinJ.-C. (Ed.), Virtual Worlds: Second International Conference, VW2000, Paris, France, July 2000, Proceedings (pp. 270–285). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
17.
SjotromC., & Rassmus-GrohnK. (1999). The sense of touch provides new computer interaction techniques for disabled people. Technology Disability10, 45–52.
18.
SupaloC. (2005). Techniques to enhance instructors’ teaching effectiveness with chemistry students who are blind or visually impaired. Journal of Chemical Education, 82, 1513–1518.
19.
VillaR. A., & ThousandJ. S. (2003). Making inclusive education work. Educational Leadership, 61(2), 19–23.
20.
VillaR. A., ThousandJ. S., NevinA., & ListonA. (2005). Successful inclusive practices in middle and secondary schools. American Secondary Education, 33(3), 33–50.
21.
YuW., RamlollR., & BrewsterS. A. (2001). Haptic graphs for blind computer users. In BrewsterS. A., & Murray-SmithR. (Eds.), Lecture notes in computer science, 2058 (pp. 41–51). Berlin: Springer.
