Paraeducators who were employed by local school districts and residential schools for students with visual impairments were surveyed to determine if there are differences in their roles, training needs, and perceptions of supervisors’ competencies. The paraeducators in local schools reported more training, the provision of less direct service, and greater supervision by more competent teachers of students with visual impairments than did their residential school counterparts.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BroerS. M., DoyleM. B., & GiangrecoM. F. (2005). Perspectives of students with intellectual disabilities about their experiences with paraprofessional support. Exceptional Children, 71, 415–430.
DrecktrahM. E. (2000). Preservice teachers’ preparation to work with paraeducators. Teacher Education and Special Education, 23, 157–164.
4.
FrenchN. K. (1998). Working together: Resource teachers and paraeducators. Remedial and Special Education, 19, 357–368.
5.
FrenchN. K. (2001). Supervising paraprofessionals: A survey of teacher practices. Journal of Special Education, 35(1), 41–53.
6.
FrenchN. K., & ChopraR. V. (1999). Parent perspectives on the roles of paraprofessionals. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 24, 259–272.
7.
GhereG., & York-BarrJ. (2007). Paraprofessional turnover and retention in inclusive programs: Hidden costs and promising practices. Remedial and Special Education, 28(1), 21–32.
8.
GiangrecoM. F., EdelmanS. W., BroerS. M., & DoyleM. B. (2001). Paraprofessional support of students with disabilities: Literature from the past decade. Exceptional Children, 68, 45–63.
9.
GiangrecoM. F., EdelmanS. W., LuiselliT. E., & MacFarlandS. Z. C. (1997). Helping or hovering? Effects of instructional assistant proximity on students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 64, 7–18.
HatlenP. (1996). The core curriculum for blind and visually impaired students, including those with additional disabilities. RE:view, 28, 25–32.
12.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 34 C.F.R. § 612(14)(B)(2004).
13.
LewisS., & McKenzieA. R. (2009). Knowledge and skills for teachers of students with visual impairments supervising the work of paraeducators. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 103, 481–494.
14.
MarksS. U., SchraderC., & LevineM. (1999). Pareducator experiences in inclusive settings: Helping, hovering, or holding their own?Exceptional Children, 65, 315–328.
15.
McKenzieA. R., & LewisS. (2008). The role and training of paraprofessionals working with students who are visually impaired. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 102, 459–471.
16.
MinondoS., MeyerL. H., XinJ. F. (2001). The role and responsibilities of teaching assistants in inclusive education: What's appropriate?Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 26, 114–119.
No Child Left Behind Act (NLCB). of 2001. Title 20 U.S.C. 6301 et seq.
19.
PickettA. L., LikinsM., & WallaceT. (2003). The employment and preparation of paraeducators.New York: National Resource Center for Paraeducators.
20.
SalzbergC. L., & MorganJ. (1995). Preparing teachers to work with paraeducators. Teacher Education and Special Education, 18, 49–55.
21.
Study of Personnel Needs in Special Education. (2001). The role of paraprofessionals in special education (fact sheet). Washington, DC: Author.
22.
TrautmanM. L. (2004). Preparing and managing paraprofessionals. Intervention in School and Clinic, 39, 131–138.
23.
WallaceT., ShinJ., BartholomayT., & StahlB. J. (2001). Knowledge and skills of teacher supervising the work of paraprofessionals. Exceptional Children, 67, 520–533.
