This study examined the usability of an assessment-for-learning (AfL) system that provides audio-tactile graphics for algebra content (geometric sequences) for individuals with visual impairments—two who are blind and two with low vision. It found that the system is generally usable as a mathematics AfL system.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BennettR. E., & GitomerD. H. (2009). Transforming K–12 assessment: Integrating accountability testing, formative assessment and professional support. In Wyatt-SmithC., & CummingJ. (Eds.), Assessment issues of the 21st century (pp. 43–61). New York: Springer.
2.
HansenE. G., ForerD. C., & LeeM. J. (2004). Toward accessible computer-based tests: Prototypes for visual and other disabilities (TOEFL Research Report 78). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
3.
HansenE. G., & MislevyR. J. (2005). Accessibility of computer-based testing for individuals with disabilities and English language learners within a validity framework. In HrickoM., & HowellS. (Eds.), Online assessment and measurement: Foundation, challenges, and issues (pp. 214–262). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
LandauS. (2005). ACED for the TTT: Interim Report 1.New York: Touch Graphics.
6.
MislevyR. J., SteinbergL. S., & AlmondR. G. (2003). On the structure of educational assessments. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 1, 3–62.
QuellmalzE. S., & PellegrinoJ. W. (2009). Technology and testing. Science, 323(5910), 75–79.
9.
RazzaqL., & HeffernanN. T. (2006). Scaffolding vs. hints in the Assistment System. In IkedaM., AshleyK. D., & ChanT. W. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th international conference on intelligent tutoring systems (ITS 2006) (pp. 635–644). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
10.
ShuteV. J., GrafE. A., & HansenE. (2005). Designing adaptive, diagnostic math assessments for individuals with and without visual disabilities. In PytlikZilligL., BruningR., and BodvarssonM. (Eds.), Technology-based education: Bringing researchers and practitioners together (pp. 169–202). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
11.
ShuteV. J., HansenE. G., & AlmondR. G. (2008). You can't fatten a hog by weighing it—Or can you? Evaluating an assessment for learning system called ACED. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Education, 18, 289–316.
12.
WainerH., DoransN. J., FlaugherR., GreenB. F., MislevyR. J., SteinbergL., & ThissenD. (2000). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
