The purpose of this study was to understand and describe the misconceptions of students with visual impairments about seasonal change. Students who participated in traditional instruction exhibited alternative conceptions before and after instruction, whereas those who participated in inquiry-based instruction had alternative conceptions before instruction and scientific understandings after instruction.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy.New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
AtwoodR. K., & AtwoodV. A. (1996). Preservice elementary teachers’ conceptions of the causes of the seasons. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 553–563.
3.
BakasC., & MikropoulosT. (2003). Design of virtual environments of planetary phenomena based on students’ ideas. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 949–967.
4.
BeckJ., CzernaikC., & LumpeA. (2000). An exploratory study of teachers’ beliefs regarding the implementation of constructivism in their classroom. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11, 323–343.
5.
Beck-WinchatzB., & RiccobonoM. A. (2008). Advancing participation of blind students in science, technology, engineering, and math. Advances in Space Research, 42, 1855–1858.
6.
BisardW., AronR., FrancekM., & NelsonB. (1994). Assessing selected physical science and earth misconceptions of middle school through university preservice teachers: Breaking the science misconception cycle. Journal of College Science Teaching, 24, 38–42.
7.
CarinA., BassJ., & ContantT. (2005). Teaching science as inquiry (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
8.
DionM., HoffmanK., & MatterA. (2000). Teacher's manual for adapting science experiments for blind and visually impaired students. Retrieved October 7, 2004, from http://www.tsbvi.edu/Education/Manual12.doc
9.
ErwinE., PerkinsT., AyalaJ., FineM., & RubinE. (2001). “You don't have to be sighted to be a scientist do you?” Issues and outcomes in science education. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 95, 338–352.
10.
GlasserB. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12, 436–445.
11.
GlasserB. G., & StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research.Chicago: Aldine.
12.
GouldA., WillardC., & PompeaS. (2004). The real reasons for seasons: Sun-Earth connections.Berkeley: Lawrence Hall of Science, University of California.
13.
HadaryD., & CohenS. (1978). Laboratory science and art for blind, deaf, and emotionally disturbed children.Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
14.
HsuY. (2008). Learning about seasons in a technologically enhanced environment: The impact of teacher-guided and student-centered instructional approaches on the process of students’ conceptual change. Science Education, 92, 320–344.
15.
JonesB., & EdbergS. (1990). Practical astronomer.New York: Simon & Schuster.
16.
KikasE. (2003). University students’ conceptions of different physical phenomena. Journal of Adult Development, 10, 139–150.
17.
KikasE. (2004). Teachers’ conceptions and misconceptions concerning three natural phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 432–448.
18.
KoenigA., & HolbrookM. (Eds.). (2000). Foundations of education, Volume 2: Instructional strategies for teaching children and youths with visual impairments (2nd ed.). New York: AFB Press.
19.
KumarD., RamassamyR., & StefanichG. (2001). Science for students with visual impairments: Teaching suggestions and policy implication for secondary learners. [Electronic version]. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 5, 1–9.
20.
LinnM., & TheirH. (1975). Adapting science material for the blind (ASMB): Expectation for student outcomes. Science Education, 59, 237–246.
21.
LongN. (1973). Science curriculum improvement study (SCIS): Its effect on concept development and manipulative skills in visually handicapped children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.
22.
LynchS., TaymansJ., WatsonW., OchsendorfR., PykeC., & SzeszeM. (2007). Effectiveness of a highly rated science curriculum unit for students with disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptional Children, 73, 202–223.
23.
MastopieriM. (2005). Margo Mastopieri on science education and students with disabilities. In CarinA., BassJ., & ContantT. (Eds.), Teaching science as inquiry (pp. 287–288). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
24.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
25.
RidpathI. (1987). Longman illustrated dictionary of astronomy and astronautics.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Longman.
26.
RoaldI., & MikalsenO. (2001). Configuration and dynamics of the Earth-Sun-Moon system: An investigation into conceptions of deaf and hearing pupils. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 423–440.
27.
SeidmanI. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
28.
StathopoulouC., & VosniadouS. (2007). Conceptual change in physics and physics-related epistemological beliefs: A relationship under scrutiny. In VosniadouS., BaltaA., & VamvokoussiX. (Eds.), Reframing the conceptual change approach in learning and instruction (pp. 145–165). Boston: Earli.
29.
StruveN., TheirH., HadaryD., & LinnM. (1975). The effect of an experiential science curriculum for the visually impaired on course objectives and manipulative skills. Education of the Visually Handicapped, 7, 9–14.
30.
TrumperR. (2001a). A cross-age study of junior high school students’ conceptions of basic astronomy concepts. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 1111–1123.
31.
TrumperR. (2001b). A cross-age study of senior high school students’ conceptions of basic astronomy concepts. Research in Science & Technological Education, 19, 97–109.
32.
TrumperR. (2006). Teaching future teachers basic astronomy concepts—seasonal changes—at a time of reform in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 879–906.
33.
TrundleK. C., AtwoodR. K., & ChristopherJ. E. (2002). Preservice elementary teachers’ conceptions of moon phases before and after instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 633–658.
34.
TrundleK., AtwoodR., & ChristopherJ. (2007a). Fourth-grade elementary students’ conceptions of standards-based lunar concepts. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 595–616.
35.
TrundleK., AtwoodR., & ChristopherJ. (2007b). A longitudinal study of conceptual change: Preservice elementary teachers’ conceptions of moon phases. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 303–326.
36.
VosniadouS. (2001). What can persuasion research tell us about conceptual change that we did not already know?International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 731–737.
37.
VosniadouS. (2007a). The conceptual change approach and its re-framing. In VosniadouS., BaltaA., & VamvokoussiX. (Eds.), Reframing the conceptual change approach in learning and instruction (pp. 1–17). Boston: Earli.
38.
VosniadouS. (2007b). Personal epistemology and conceptual change: An introduction. In VosniadouS., BaltaA., & VamvokoussiX. (Eds.), Reframing the conceptual change approach in learning and instruction (pp. 99–105). Boston: Earli.
39.
VosniadouS., IoannidesC., DimitrakopoulouA., & PapademetriouE. (2001). Designing learning environments to promote conceptual change in science. Learning and Instruction, 11, 381–419.
40.
WaskoskieW. (1980). Teaching biology concepts to blind college-level students through audio-tutorial-self-instruct laboratory experiences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
41.
WildT., PaulP., & KurzN. (2008). Teacher beliefs concerning curriculum standards, pedagogical practices, inclusion, assessment, and collaboration with science content educators in implementing science education for students with visual impairments. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association of Science Teacher Education, St. Louis, MO.
42.
WilloughbyD., & DuffyS. (1989). Handbook for itinerant and resource teachers of blind and visually impaired students.Baltimore, MD: National Federation of the Blind.
43.
ZeilikM., & BisardW. (2000). Conceptual change in introductory-level astronomy courses: Tracking misconceptions to reveal which—and how much—concepts change. Journal of College Science Teaching, 29, 229–232.
