A systematic review of the international literature was conducted to investigate the effects and effectiveness of electronic mobility devices. Of the 13 studies that were reviewed, all but one demonstrated effects of the use of these devices, and generally, users evaluated the devices’ functionality as beneficial.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbnerG. H., & LahmE. A. (2002). Implementation of assistive technology with students who are visually impaired: Teachers’ readiness. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 96, 98–105.
2.
BaldwinD. (2003). Wayfinding technology: A road map to the future. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 97, 612–620.
3.
BlaschB. B., LongR. G., & Griffin-ShirleyN. (1989). Results of a national survey of electronic travel aid use. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 83, 449–453.
4.
Clark-CarterD. D., HeyesA. D., & HowarthC. I. (1986). The effect of non-visual preview upon the walking speed of visually impaired people. Ergonomics, 29, 1575–1581.
5.
DarlingN. C., GoodrichG. L., & WileyJ. K. (1977). A preliminary follow-up study of electronic travel aid users. Bulletin of Prosthetics Research, 10, 82–91.
6.
DoddsA. G., Clark-CarterD. D., & HowarthC. I. (1984). The Sonic Pathfinder: An evaluation. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 78, 203–206.
7.
DouglasG., CorcoranC., & PaveyS. (2006). Network 1000. Opinions and circumstances of visually impaired people in Great Britain: Report based on over 1000 interviews.Birmingham, England: Visual Impairment Centre for Teaching and Research, University of Birmingham. Retrieved July 28, 2008, from http://www.vision2020uk.org.uk/library.asp?libraryID=685§ion=000100050005
8.
FarcyR., LerouxR., JuchaA., DamaschiniR., GrégoireC., & ZogaghiA. (2006). Electronic travel aids and electronic orientation aids for blind people: Technical, rehabilitation and everyday life points of view. In HershM. A. (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Assistive Technologies for Vision and Hearing Impairment, Kufstein, Austria. Retrieved October 15, 2007, from http://www.lac.u-psud.fr/teletact/publications/farcy_cvhi2006.pdf
9.
FarmerL. W., & SmithD. L. (1997). Adaptive technology. In BlaschB. B., WienerW. R., & WelshR. L. (Eds.), Foundations of orientation and mobility (pp. 231–259). New York: AFB Press.
10.
FruchtermanJ. R. (2003). In the palm of your hand: A vision of the future of technology for people with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 97, 585–591.
11.
GillJ. (2005). Priorities for technological research for visually impaired people. Visual Impairment Research, 7, 59–61.
12.
HeyesA. D., DurinckM., & BeatonT. (1988). The Sonic Pathfinder: Developments and preliminary field trial results. In Neustadt-NoyN., MerlinS., & SchiffY. (Eds.), Orientation and mobility of the visually impaired: Based on papers presented at the 4th International Mobility Conference Jerusalem (pp. 197–203). Jerusalem: Heiliger.
13.
JacobsonW. H., & SmithT. E. C. (1983). Use of the Sonicguide and Laser Cane in obtaining and keeping employment. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 77, 12–15.
14.
JoffeeE. (1987). Role of electronic travel aids: Field applications of the Russell Path-sounder. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 81, 389–390.
15.
JonesT., & JainJ. (2006). Examining the experiences of sight-impaired travellers: The next station stop?British Journal of Visual Impairment, 24, 141–144.
16.
KappermanG., StickenJ., & HeinzeT. (2002). Survey of the use of assistive technology by Illinois students who are visually impaired. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 96, 106–108.
17.
LaGrowS. (1999). The use of the Sonic Pathfinder as a secondary mobility aid for travel in business environments: A single-subject design. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 36, 333–340.
18.
McKinleyJ., GoldfarbE., & GoodrichG. (1994). An evaluation of the Sonic Pathfinder. In Proceedings of the 7th International Mobility Conference, Melbourne (pp. 177–179). Melbourne: Royal Guide Dog Association of Australia.
19.
PenrodW. M., BauderD. K., SimmonsT., BelcherL., & CorleyJ. W. (2007). Efficacy of the UltraCane: A product evaluation and pilot study to determine the efficacy of the UltraCane in outdoor environments. Closing the Gap, 25(5), 19–21.
20.
PonchillaP. E., MacKenzieN., LongR. G., Denton-SmithP., HicksT., & MileyP. (2007). Finding a target with an accessible Global Positioning System. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 101, 479–488.
21.
PonchillaP. E., RakE. C., FreelandA. L., & LaGrowS. J. (2007). Accessible GPS: Reorientation and target location among users with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 101, 389–401.
22.
PrimeauL. A. (1996). Human daily travel: Personal choices and external constraints. In ZemkeR., & ClarkF. (Eds.), Occupational science: The evolving discipline (pp. 115–124). Philadelphia: Davis.
23.
RoentgenU. R., GelderblomG. J., SoedeM., & de WitteL. P. (2008). Inventory of electronic mobility aids for visually impaired persons—A literature review. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 102, 702–724.
24.
SimonE. P. (1984). A report on electronic travel aid users: Three to five years later. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 78, 478–480.
25.
StrobelW., FossaJ., PanchuraC., BeaverK., & WestbrookJ. (2003). The industry profile on visual impairment.Buffalo: Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center on Technology Transfer, State University of New York at Buffalo. Retrieved March 13, 2008, from http://t2rerc.buffalo.edu/pubs/ip/VI/IP_VI.pdf
26.
VirgiliG., & RubinG. (2006). Orientation and mobility training for adults with low vision (review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Online), Issue 2. Retrieved July 15, 2009, from http://www.cochrane.org/reviews/en/ab003925.htm
