This literature review outlines the history of the braille code as used in the United States and Canada, illustrating how both the code itself and instructional strategies for teaching it changed over time. The review sets the stage for the research questions of the recently completed Alphabetic Braille and Contracted Braille Study.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AshcroftS. C. (1960). Errors in oral reading of braille at elementary grade levels. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
2.
BiggsI. (1950). The introduction of grade two braille in the primary grades. Outlook for the Blind, 44, 103–105.
BogartD. (2000). The literary code. In DixonJ. (Ed.), Braille into the next millennium (pp. 106–119). Washington, DC: Library of Congress.
5.
CatonH. (1979). A primary reading program for beginning braille readers. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 73, 309–313.
6.
CatonH., & BradleyE. J. (1978–79). A new approach to beginning braille reading. Education of the Visually Handicapped, 10, 66–71.
7.
CatonH., PesterE., & BradleyE. J. (1980). Patterns: The primary braille reading program.Louisville, KY: American Printing House for the Blind.
8.
ChallJ. (1967). Learning to read: The great debate.New York: McGraw-Hill.
9.
ElmsH. (1959). Short cuts in learning braille. Education of the Blind, 9(1), 4–9.
10.
HarleyR. K., & RawlsR. (1970). Comparison of several approaches for teaching braille reading to blind children. Education of the Visually Handicapped, 2(2), 47–51.
11.
HendersonF. (1960). Little bumps that say something. Exceptional Children, 26, 261–266.
12.
HerzbergT. S., StoughL. M., & ClarkC. M. (2004). Teaching and assessing the appropriateness of uncontracted braille. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 98, 773–779.
13.
HongS., & ErinJ. N. (2004). The impact of early exposure to uncontracted braille reading on students with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 98, 325–340.
14.
IrwinR. B. (1932, September). Uniform braille for the English-speaking world achieved. Outlook for the Blind, 26, 137–138.
15.
IrwinR. B. (1955). As I see it.New York: American Foundation for the Blind.
16.
IrwinR. B., & WilcoxR. E. (1929). A comparative study of braille grade one and a half and braille grade two.New York: American Foundation for the Blind.
17.
JohnsonL. (1989). Let's teach grade one braille. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 83, 491–493.
18.
LoomisM. S. (1948). Which grade of braille should be taught first?New York: Columbia University Press.
19.
LorimerP. (2000). Origins of braille. In DixonJ. (Ed.), Braille into the next millennium (pp. 18–39). Washington, DC: Library of Congress.
20.
LowenfeldB., AbelG. L., & HatlenP. H. (1969). Blind children learn to read.Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
21.
MangoldS. S. (1978). Tactile perception and braille letter recognition: Effects of developmental teaching. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 72, 259–266.
22.
MangoldS. S. (1994). Developmental program of tactile perception and braille letter recognition.Castro Valley, CA: Exceptional Teaching Aids.
23.
MaxfieldK. (1928). The blind child and his reading.New York: American Foundation for the Blind.
24.
NolanC., & KederisC. (1969). Perceptual factors in braille word recognition.New York: American Foundation for the Blind.
25.
RodenbergL. W. (1932, December). The significance of standard English braille. Outlook for the Blind, 26, 199–203.
26.
SpunginS. J., & D'AndreaF. M. (2000). Braille literacy. In DixonJ. (Ed.), Braille into the next millennium (pp. 434–461). Washington, DC: Library of Congress.
27.
SpunginS. J., & TaylorJ. L. (1986). The teacher. In SchollG. T. (Ed.), Foundations of education for blind and visually handicapped children and youths (pp. 255–264). New York: American Foundation for the Blind.
28.
StephanieM. (n.d.). Catholic blind education section: Present trend to grade two in braille. The Catholic Educational Association Bulletin, 507–509.
29.
TobeC. E. (2000). Embossed printing in the United States. In DixonJ. (Ed.), Braille into the next millennium (pp. 40–71). Washington, DC: Library of Congress.
30.
TroughtonM. (1992). One is fun: Guidelines for better braille literacy.Brantford, Ontario: Dialtype.
31.
WilsonE. A. (1932). Why we teach grade two. Outlook for the Blind, 26(1), 35–38.
32.
ZiegelH., & OstendorffM. E. (1953). Why make braille more difficult for beginners?International Journal for the Education of the Blind, 2, 182–183.
