This article presents the results of two studies on the accessibility of e-learning materials and other information and computer and communication technologies for 143 Canadian college and university students with low vision and 29 who were blind. It offers recommendations for enhancing access, creating new learning opportunities, and eliminating obstacles.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArgyropoulosV. S., SideridisG. D., & KatsoulisP. (2008). The impact of the perspectives of teachers and parents on the literacy media selections for independent study of students who are visually impaired. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 102, 221–231.
2.
AsuncionJ., DraffanE. A., GuinanE. P., & ThompsonT. (2009). International comparison on accessible technology in higher education. ATHEN E-Journal (Issue 4). Retrieved July 6, 2009, from http://www.athenpro.org/node/120
BurgstahlerS., CorriganB., & McCarterJ. (2005). Steps toward making distance learning accessible to students and instructors with disabilities. Information Technology and Disabilities, 11(1). Retrieved September 2, 2009, from http://people.rit.edu/easi/itd/itdv11.htm
5.
CravenJ., & BrophyP. (2003). Non-visual access to the digital library (NoVA): The use of the digital library interfaces by blind and visually impaired people.Manchester, England: Centre for Research in Library and Information Management, Manchester Metropolitan University.
6.
FichtenC. S., AsuncionJ. V., NguyenM. N., BuddJ., & AmselR. (2009). The POSITIVES Scale: Development and validation of a measure of how well the ICT needs of students with disabilities are met. Manuscript submitted for publication.
7.
FichtenC. S., NguyenM. N., BarileM., & AsuncionJ. (2007). Scale of Adaptive Information Technology Accessibility for Postsecondary Students with Disabilities (SAITAPSD): A preliminary investigation. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 20, 54–75.
8.
FosseyM. E., AsuncionJ. V., FichtenC. S., RobillardC., BarileM., AmselR., PrezantF., & MorabitoS. (2005). Development and validation of the Accessibility of Campus Computing for Students with Disabilities Scale (ACCSDS). Journal of Post-secondary Education and Disability, 18, 23–33.
9.
HardingT., BlaineD., WhelleyT. A., & ChangC. (2006). A comparison of the provision of educational supports to students with disabilities in AHEAD versus non-AHEAD affiliated institutions. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 18, 125–134.
10.
Kamei-HannanC. (2008). Examining the accessibility of a computerized adapted test using assistive technology. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 102, 261–271.
11.
MalikR., AsuncionJ. V., & FichtenC. S. (2005, May). Accessibility of e-learning in Canadian postsecondary education. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Psychological Society, Los Angeles.
12.
McGuireJ. M., ScottS. S., & ShawS. F. (2003). Universal design for instruction: The paradigm, its principles, and products for enhancing instructional access. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 17, 10–20.
