This study investigated the use of assistive technology by students in the United States who are visually impaired through a secondary analysis of a nationally representative database. It found that the majority of students were not using assistive technology. Implications for interventions and potential changes in policy or practice are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbnerG., & LahmE. (2002). Implementation of assistive technology with students who are visually impaired: Teachers’ readiness. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 96, 98–105.
2.
American Foundation for the Blind. (2005). An overview of services.New York: Author. Retrieved November 25, 2007, from http://www.afb.org/diroverview.asp
AugustoC., & SchroederP. (1995). Ensuring equal access to information for people who are blind or visually impaired. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 89, 9–13.
5.
CahillH., LinehanC., McCarthyG., BormansG., & EngelenJ. (1996). Blind and partially sighted students’ access to mathematics and computer technology in Ireland and Belgium. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 90, 105–114.
6.
DickT., & KubiakE. (1997). Issues and aids for teaching mathematics to the blind. The Mathematics Teacher, 90, 344–349.
7.
GodardP., McCrackenM., RollinJ., Van CampenJ., ValdesK., & WilliamsonC. (2007). Special Elementary Education Longitudinal Study waves 1, 2, & 3 data documentation and dictionary.Unpublished manuscript. Washington, DC: Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
8.
HancockK., WilgoshL., & McDonaldL. (1990). Parenting a visually impaired child: The mother's perspective. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 84, 411–413.
9.
HernandezT. J., & SeemS. R. (2004). A safe school climate: A systematic approach and the school counselor. Professional School Counseling, 7, 256–262.
10.
KappermanG., StickenJ., & HeinzeT. (2002). Survey of the use of assistive technology by Illinois students who are visually impaired. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 96, 106–108.
11.
NoonanJ. (2004). School climate and the safe school: Seven contributing factors. Educational Horizons, 83, 61–65.
12.
RappD. W., & RappA. J. (1992). A survey of the current status of visually impaired students in secondary mathematics. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 86, 115–117.
13.
SingerG., MarquisJ., PowersL., BlanchardL., DivenereN., SantelliB., AinbinderJ., & SharpM. (1999). A multi-site evaluation of Parent to Parent programs for parents of children with disabilities. Journal of Early Intervention, 22, 217–229.
14.
SmithA. J., GerushchatD., & HuebnerK. M. (2004). Policy to practice: Teachers’ and administrators’ views on curricular access by students with low vision. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 98, 612–628.
15.
Special Education Elementary Longitudinal Study, Waves 1, 2, & 3 [CD-ROM database, with accompanying documentation] (produced under contract no. ED-00-CO-0017). (2003). Available from U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs.