Bach-y-RitaP. (1972). Brain mechanisms in sensory substitution.New York: Academic Press.
2.
BergerC. (1992). Perception analytique et globale [Analytical and holistic perception]. L'Année Psychologique, 92, 105–136.
3.
BergerC., & HatwellY. (1996). Developmental trends in haptics and visual free classifications: Influence of stimulus structure and exploration and decisional processes. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 447–465.
4.
BlissJ. C., KatcherM. H., RogersC. H., & ShepardR. P. (1970). Optical-to-tactile image conversion for the blind. IEEE Transactions on Man–Machine Systems, 11(1), 58–65.
5.
CookG. L., & OdomR. D. (1988). Perceptual sensitivity to dimensional and similarity relations in free and rule-governed classification. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 45, 319–338.
6.
GapenneO., RoviraK., Ali AmmarA., & LenayC. (2003). Tactos: A special computer interface for the reading and writing of 2-D forms in blind people. In StephanidisC. (Ed.), Universal access in HCI: Inclusive design in the information society (pp. 1270–1274). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
LenayC., GapenneO., HannetonS., MarqueC., & GenouëlleC. (2003). Sensory substitution, limits, and perspectives. In HatwellY., StreriA., & GentazE. (Eds.), Touch for knowing (pp. 275–292). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
8.
RoviraK., & GapenneO. (2008). Catégoriser à l'aide d'un système de suppléance perceptive: Stratégies d'exploration et de classification d'adolescents aveugles [Categorizing with the help of a sensory substitution device: Exploration and classification strategies in blind teenagers]. In LoarerE., VrignaudP., MogenetJ. L., CuisinierF., GottesdienerH., & MalletP. (Eds.), Perspectives différentielles en psychologie (pp. 399–402). Rennes, France: Presses Universitaire de Rennes.
9.
SchwarzerG., KüferI., & WilkeningF. (1999). Learning categories by touch: On the development of holistic and analytic processing. Memory and Cognition, 27, 868–877.
10.
SribunruangritN., MarqueC., LenayC., GapenneO., & VanhoutteC. (2004). Speed-accuracy trade-off during performance of a tracking task without visual feedback. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 12, 131–139.
11.
ZiatM., GapenneO., StewartJ., & LenayC. (2007). Haptic recognition of shapes at different scales: A comparison of two methods of interaction. Interacting with Computers, 19, 121–132.