BourquinE., & SauerburgerD. (2005). Teaching deaf-blind people to communicate and interact with the public. RE:view, 37, 109–116.
2.
DeFioreE. N., & SilverR. (1988). A redesigned assistance card for the deaf-blind traveler. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 82, 175–177.
3.
FranklinP., & BourquinE. (2000). Picture this: A pilot study for improving street crossings for deaf-blind travelers. RE:view, 31, 173–179.
4.
HornerR. H., CarrE. G., HalleJ., OdomS., & WoleryM. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179.
5.
HuebnerK., PrickettJ., WelchT., & JoffeeE. (Eds.). (1994). Hand in hand: Essentials of communication and orientation and mobility for your students who are deaf-blind (Vols. 1 & 2). New York: AFB Press.
6.
JoffeeE., & RikhyeC. H. (1991). Orientation and mobility for students with severe visual and multiple impairments: A new perspective. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 85, 211–216.
7.
KennedyC. H. (2005). Single-case designs for educational research.Boston: Pearson Education.
8.
LaGrowS. J., & MurrayS. (1992). Use of alternating treatment design to evaluate intervention in low vision rehabilitation. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 86, 435–439.
9.
LancioniG. E., BelliniD., & OlivaD. (1993a). Brief report: Building choice opportunities within a robot-assisted occupational program: A case study. Behavioral Residential Treatment, 8, 219–226.
10.
LancioniG. E., BelliniD., & OlivaD. (1993b). A robot to provide multihandicapped blind persons with physical guidance and activity choices. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 5, 337–348.
11.
LancioniG. E., BelliniD., OlivaD., GuzziniF., & PiraniP. (1989). A robot for guiding multihandicapped blind persons to carry out familiar daily activities. Journal of the Multihandicapped Person, 2, 271–282.
12.
LancioniG. E., MantiniM., CogniniI., & PiraniP. (1998). Facilitating ambulation and activity in persons with profound multiple disabilities through a visual orientation system. Behavioral Interventions, 13, 123–133.
13.
LancioniG. E., OlivaD., AdorniA., GuzziniF., LocatelliM., & SpinaciP. (1988). Promoting unsupervised activities with low-functioning blind persons: Evaluation of a computer-aided program. Behavioral Residential Treatment, 3, 85–100.
14.
LancioniG. E., OlivaD., & BartoliniT. (1990). A blind woman who is mentally retarded promoting and sharing the occupational engagement of a dependent deaf-blind adolescent. Behavioral Residential Treatment, 5, 149–157.
15.
LancioniG. E., OlivaD., & BracalenteS. (1994). An electronic guidance system for multihandicapped blind persons: Evaluating its effectiveness and likeableness. Behavioral Interventions, 9, 93–103.
16.
LancioniG. E., OlivaD., FormicaM. M., & RossettiA. (1988). Applicability of a computer-aided program to increase the occupational engagement of low-functioning blind persons. Journal of the Multihandicapped Person, 1, 271–279.
17.
LancioniG. E., OlivaD., & O'ReillyM. F. (1997). Ambulation, object manipulation, and multiple disabilities: Extending the applicability of a robot. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 91, 53–61.
18.
LancioniG. E., OlivaD., & RaimondiD. (1992). Two multihandicapped blind persons promoting mobility and activity in a passive deaf-blind companion. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 4, 129–139.
19.
LancioniG. E., O'ReillyM. F., & CampodonicoF. (2000). Assisted ambulation and activity for restless or passive persons with profound multiple disabilities: Assessing performance and preferences. Behavioral Interventions, 15, 331–343.
20.
LancioniG. E., O'ReillyM. F., CampodonicoF., & MantiniM. (1998). Mobility versus sedentariness in task arrangements for people with multiple disabilities: An assessment of preferences. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 19, 465–475.
21.
LancioniG. E., O'ReillyM. F., CampodonicoF., & SerenelliS. (2000). Use of anticipatory cues to reduce dependence on physical prompts by an adolescent with multiple disabilities. Scandinavian Journal of Behavioral Therapy, 29, 43–47.
22.
LancioniG. E., SinghN. N., O'ReillyM. F., SigafoosJ., OlivaD., PiazzollaG., PidalaS., SmaldoneA., & ManfrediF. (2007). Automatically delivered stimulation for walker-assisted step responses: Measuring its effects in persons with multiple disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 19, 1–13.
23.
LongR. G. (1990). Orientation and mobility research: What is known and what needs to be known. Peabody Journal of Education, 67, 89–109.
24.
National Technical Assistance Consortium for Children and Young Adults Who Are Deaf-Blind. (2005). Annual deaf-blind census.Monmouth, OR: Teaching Research Institute.
25.
ParkerA. T., DavidsonR. C., & BandaD. R. (2007). Emerging evidence from single-subject research in the field of deaf-blindness. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 101, 690–700.
26.
SurakkaA., & KiveläT. (2006). A new method to train and measure 90-degree turns in visually impaired and deaf-blind subjects. Visual Impairment Research, 8, 41–47.
27.
TawneyJ. W., & GastD. L. (1984). Single subject research in special education.Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
28.
UslanM. M. (1979). Orientation and mobility for severely and profoundly retarded blind persons. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 73, 54–58.