This study assessed the ability of people with visual impairments to reliably detect oncoming traffic at crossing situations with no traffic control. In at least one condition, the participants could not hear vehicles to afford a safe crossing time when sound levels were as quiet as possible. Significant predictors of detection accounted for a third of the variation in the detection time.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenW., Courtney-BarbierA., GriffithA., KernT., & ShawC. (1997). Orientation and mobility teaching manual (2nd ed.). New York: CIL Publications.
2.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2004). A policy on geometric design of highways and streets (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
3.
ElliottL. L. (1971). Backward and forward masking. Audiology, 10(2), 65–76.
4.
Federal Highway Administration. (1995). Highway traffic noise analysis and abatement policy and guidance.Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration Office of Environment and Planning, Noise and Air Quality Branch. Retrieved June 29, 2008, from http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/polguid.pdf
5.
GeruschatD. R., & HassanS. E. (2005). Driver behavior in yielding to sighted and blind pedestrians at roundabouts. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 99, 286–302.
6.
GuthD., AshmeadD., LongR., WallR., & PonchilliaP. (2005). Blind and sighted pedestrians’ judgments of gaps in traffic at roundabouts. Human Factors, 47, 314–331.
7.
InmanV. W., DavisG. W., & SauerburgerD. (2005). Roundabout access for visually impaired pedestrians: Evaluation of a yielding vehicle alerting system for double-lane roundabouts. In Roundabout Conference Proceedings: 2005, Vail, CO.Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
8.
JacobsonW. H. (1993). The art and science of teaching orientation and mobility to persons with visual impairments.New York: American Foundation for the Blind.
9.
LaGrowS., & WeessiesM. (1994). Orientation and mobility: Techniques for independence.Palmerston North, New Zealand: Dunmore Press.
10.
LaPlanteJ., & KaeserT. (2004). The continuing evolution of pedestrian walking speed assumptions. ITE Journal, 74(9), 43–40.
11.
PogrundR., HealyG., JonesK., LevackN., Martin-CurryS., MartinezC., MarzJ., Robertson-SmithB., & VrbaA. (1993). TAPS—An O&M curriculum for students with visual impairments.Austin: Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired.
12.
SauerburgerD. (1989). To cross or not to cross: Objective timing methods of assessing street crossings without traffic controls. RE:view, 21, 153–161.
13.
SauerburgerD. (1995). Safety awareness for crossing streets with no traffic control. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 89, 423–431.
14.
SauerburgerD. (1999). Developing criteria and judgment of safety for crossing streets with gaps in traffic. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 93, 447–450.
15.
SauerburgerD. (2003, March 25). Do drivers stop at unsignalized intersections for pedestrians who are blind? Paper presented at the Conference of Institute of Transportation Engineers, Fort Lauderdale, FL.
16.
SauerburgerD. (2006). Instructional strategies for teaching judgment in detecting gaps for crossing streets with no traffic controls. RE:view, 37, 177–188.
17.
ScheffersW., & MyersL. (1995). Intersection analysis. In San Francisco State University orientation and mobility reader (pp. L5–L8). San Francisco: San Francisco State University Department of Special Education.
18.
Snook-HillM. M., & SauerburgerD. (1996). Teaching students to assess safety for crossing streets which have no traffic control. In Proceedings of International Mobility Conference VIII (pp. 535–540). Melhus, Norway: Tambartun National Resource Centre.
19.
WadhwaL. C. (2003, January 16). Roundabouts and pedestrians with visual disabilities: How can we make them safer? Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board conference, Washington, DC.
20.
WienerW. R., & LawsonG. D. (1997). Audition for the traveler who is visually impaired. In WelshR., WienerW. R., & BlaschB. B. (Eds.), Foundations of orientation and mobility (2nd ed., pp. 104–169). New York: AFB Press.
21.
WienerW., NaghshinehK., SalisburyB., & RozemaJ. (2006). The impact of hybrid vehicles on street crossings. RE:view, 38, 65–78.
22.
WienerW. R., & SiffermannE. (1997). The development of the profession of orientation and mobility. In WelshR., WienerW. R., & BlaschB. B. (Eds.), Foundations of orientation and mobility (2nd ed., pp. 553–579). New York: AFB Press.
23.
Wyle Laboratories. (1971, December 31). Community noise.Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Noise Abatement and Control. Retrieved June 2, 2008, from http://www.nonoise.org/epa/roll14/roll14doc65.pdf
