This study explored the choices of literacy media for independent study of students with visual impairments. The predictors that were taken into account were teachers’ use of technology, experience in teaching, and mastery of braille and the knowledge of braille of students, parents, and close friends.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbnerG. H., & LahmE. A. (2002). Implementation of assistive technology with students who are visually impaired: Teachers’ readiness. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 96, 98–105.
2.
AikenL. S., & WestS. G. (1992). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
AllmanC. B. (1998). Braille communication skills: What teachers teach and visually impaired adults use. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 92, 331–338.
BjörnB., JönssonB., FelleniusK., & StrömqvistS. (2006). Disclosing the secrets of braille reading—Computer-aided registration and interactive analysis. Visual Impairment Research, 8, 49–59.
6.
British Department for Education. (1994). The parents’ charter.London: Her Majesty's Stationary Office.
7.
BrykA. S., & RaudenbushS. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8.
CohenJ. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.
9.
CooperL. H., & NicholsK. S. (2007). Technology and early braille literacy: Using the Mountbatten Pro brailler in primary-grade classrooms. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 101, 22–31.
10.
CornA. L., & WallR. S. (2002). Access to multimedia presentations for students with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 96, 197–211.
11.
DysonA. (2000). Inclusion and inclusions: Theories and discourses in inclusive education. In DanielsH., & GarnerP. (Eds.), Inclusive education (pp. 36–53). London: Kogan Page.
12.
ErinJ. N., HongS., SchochC., & KuoY. (2006). Relationships among testing medium, test performance, and testing time of high school students who are visually impaired. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 100, 523–532.
13.
GerberE. (2003). The benefits of and barriers to computer use for individuals who are visually impaired. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 97, 536–550.
14.
HatlenP. (2000). The core curriculum for blind and visually impaired students, including those with additional disabilities. In KoeningA. J., & HolbrookM. C. (Eds.), Foundations of education. Vol. II: Instructional strategies for teaching children and youths with visual impairments, (pp. 779–784). New York: AFB Press.
15.
HusseyD. (1997). Curriculum issues. In MasonH., & McCallS. (Eds.), Visual impairment: Access to education for children and young people (pp. 366–376). London: David Fulton.
16.
JohnsonL. (1996). The braille literacy crisis for children. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 90, 276–278.
17.
KoenigA. J., & HolbrookM. C. (2000). Literacy skills. In KoenigA. J., & HolbrookM. C. (Eds.), Foundations of education. Vol. II: Instructional strategies for teaching children and youths with visual impairments (pp. 264–312). New York: AFB Press.
18.
LuskK. E., & CornA. L. (2006). Learning and using print and braille: A study of dual-media learners, Part 1. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 100, 606–619.
19.
LuxtonK. (1990). Training students in adaptive computer technology. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 84, 523–528.
20.
McDonoughH., StickenE., & HaackS. (2006). The expanded core curriculum for students who are visually impaired. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 100, 596–598.
21.
RaudenbushS. W. (2001). Effects of study duration, frequency of observation and sample size on power in studies of group difference in polynomial change. Psychological Methods, 6, 387–401.
22.
RaudenbushS. W., & BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
23.
RaudenbushS. W., & XiafengL. (2000). Statistical power and optimal design for multisite randomized trials. Psychological Methods, 5, 199–213.
24.
SkrticT. M. (1995). Disability and democracy: Reconstructing (special) education for postmodernity.New York: Teachers College Press.
25.
SnijdersT. A., & BoskerR. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
SpunginS. J. (1996). Braille and beyond: Braille literacy in a larger context. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness (Special Issue on Literacy), 90(3), 271–274.
