This article presents a review of research on the development of phonological awareness by braille readers. The review determined that the relationship between phonological awareness and braille is uncertain because of the lack of commonality among the studies, the extent of contradictory findings, and the small number of studies involving beginning braille readers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnaniadouK., JenkinsA., & WolfA. (2004). Basic skills and workplace learning: What do we actually know about their benefits?Studies in Continuing Education, 26, 289–308.
2.
AnthonyJ. L., & FrancisD. J. (2005). Development of phonological awareness. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 255–259.
3.
BarclayL., D'AndreaF. M., ErinJ., HannanC. K., HolbrookC., SacksS., & WormsleyD. (2007, November). ABC Braille Study: A five-year longitudinal study of literacy environments, skills, and experiences of children who are blind. Paper presented at the Getting in Touch With Literacy Conference, St. Petersburg, FL.
4.
Barlow-BrownF., & ConnellyV. (2002). The role of letter knowledge and phonological awareness in young braille readers. Journal of Research in Reading, 25, 259–270.
5.
BlachmanB. A. (2000). Phonological awareness. In KamilM., MosenthalP., PearsonP. D., & BarrR. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 483–502). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
BlaiklockK. E. (2004). The importance of letter knowledge in the relationship between phonological awareness and reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 27(1), 36–57.
7.
BusA. G., & Van IjzendoornM. H. (1999). Phonological awareness and early reading: A meta-analysis of experimental training studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 403–415.
8.
DoddB., & ConnL. (2000). The effect of braille orthography on blind children's phonological awareness. Journal of Research in Reading, 23(1), 1–11.
9.
FerrellK. A., MasonL., YoungJ., & CooneyJ. (2006). Forty years of literacy research in blindness and visual impairment (Technical report). Greeley: University of Northern Colorado, National Center on Low-Incidence Disabilities. Retrieved March 31, 2007, from http://nclid.unco.edu/rch/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=650&Itemid=2
10.
GillonG. T., & YoungA. A. (2002). The phonological-awareness skills of children who are blind. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 96, 38–49.
11.
GoswamiU. (2000). Phonological and lexical processes. In KamilM., MosenthalP., PearsonP. D., & BarrR. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 241–267). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
IshikawaM., & RyanD. (2002). Schooling, basic skills and economic outcomes. Economics of Education Review, 21, 231–244.
14.
KutnerM., GreenbergE., JinY., BoyleB., HsuY., & DunleavyE. (2007). Literacy in everyday life: Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NCES 2007–480). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved April 3, 2007 from http://nces.ed.gov/Pubs2007/2007480.pdf
15.
LaingE., & HulmeC. (1999). Phonological and semantic processes influence beginning readers’ ability to learn to read words. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 73, 183–207.
16.
Li HalT., SpinksJ. A., EdenG. F., PerfettiC. A., & Wai TingS. (2005). Reading depends on writing, in Chinese. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(24), 8781–8785.
17.
MillarS. (1997). Reading by Touch.New York: Routledge.
18.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups (NIH Publication No. 00-4754). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
19.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction.Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
20.
PickA. D., ThomasL., & PickH. L. (1966). The role of grapheme-phoneme correspondence in the perception of braille. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 298–300.
21.
PringL. (1984). A comparison of the word recognition processes of blind and sighted children. Child Development, 55, 1865–1877.
22.
PringL. (1994). Touch and go: Learning to read braille. Reading Research Quarterly, 29(1), 67–74.
23.
RylesR. (1996). The impact of braille reading skills on employment, income, education, and reading habits. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 90, 219–227.
24.
SchatschneiderC., FrancisD. J., CarlsonC. D., FletcherJ. M., & FoormanB. R. (2004). Kindergarten prediction of reading skills: A longitudinal comparative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 265–282.
25.
ScholesR. J., & WillisB. J. (1989). Invisible speech–Oral language skills in blind braille readers. Interchange, 20(8), 1–13.
26.
SodoroJ., AllinderR. M., & Rankin-EricksonJ. L. (2002). Assessment of phonological awareness: Review of methods and tools. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 223–260.
27.
SorohanE. G. (1994). Low literacy. Training & Development, 48(1), 12.
28.
StraussS. L., & AltwergerB. (2007). The logographic nature of English alphabetics and the fallacy of direct intensive phonics instruction. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 7, 299–319.
29.
WagnerR. K., & TorgesenJ. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192–212.
30.
WakefieldC. E., HomewoodJ., & TaylorA. J. (2006). Early blindness may be associated with changes in performance on verbal fluency tasks. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 100, 306–310.
