BlankenshipK. E. (2004). Looking for success: Transition planning in Iowa. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University.
2.
Darling-HammondL. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8. [Online.] Retrieved January 24, 2004, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n1
3.
FullanM. (1982). The meaning of educational change.New York: Teachers College Press.
4.
GibsonS., & DemboM. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 569–582.
5.
GoeL., & CoggshallJ. (2007). The teacher preparation to teacher practices to student outcomes relationship in special education: Missing links and new connections.Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality.
6.
HatlenP. (1996). The core curriculum for blind and visually impaired students, including those with additional disabilities. RE:view, 28(1), 25–32.
7.
HatlenP. (2003, November). Impact of literacy on the expanded core curriculum. Paper presented at the Getting in Touch with Literacy Conference, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
8.
HatlenP., LohmeierK., SappW., & WillisD. (2008). [National Agenda Goal 8: State of the state.]. Unpublished raw data.
9.
LeeJ., GriggW., & DonahueP. (2007). The nation's report card: Reading 2007 (NCES 2007-496). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
10.
MooreW. P., & EsselmanM.E. (1992, April). Teacher efficacy, empowerment, and a focused instructional climate: Does student achievement benefit? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
11.
MurnaneR. J. (1981). The impact of school resources on the learning of inner city children.Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
12.
RosenholtzS. (1989). Teachers’ workplace: The social organization of school.New York: Longman.
13.
RossJ. A. (1992). Teacher efficacy and the effect of coaching on student achievement. Canadian Journal of Education, 17, 51–65.
14.
SmarttS. M., & ReschlyD. J. (2007). Research and policy brief: Barriers to the preparation of highly qualified teachers in reading.Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality.
15.
TurnerR. L., & CamilliG. (1988). The influence of salary schedule variables on teacher applicant pools, retention, and advanced degrees and on student achievement. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, Louisiana.
16.
WormsleyD., HolbrookC., ErinJ., & SacksS. (2007, October). Alphabetic braille and contracted braille study (ABC Braille Study): Results of a longitudinal study funded by the American Printing House for the Blind. Paper presented at the 139th Annual Meeting of the American Printing House for the Blind, Louisville, KY.