This article investigates the value of the term highly qualified as it relates to teachers of students with visual impairments. Routes to certification of teachers of students with visual impairments in the United States are not uniform and may not always reflect high-quality teacher preparation. A rationale for more stringent national standards of certification is presented.
BerryB. (2000). Quality alternatives in teacher preparation: Dodging the “silver bullet” and doing what is right for students. State Education Standard, 1(1), 21–25.
4.
CertoJ. L., & FoxJ. E. (2002). Retaining quality teachers [Electronic version]. High School Journal, 86(1), 57–76.
5.
Council for Exceptional Children. (2003). CEC standards: What every special educator must know (5th ed.). Reston, VA: Author.
6.
Darling-HammondL. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1). Retrieved June 21, 2007, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n1
7.
Darling-HammondL., BerryB., & ThoresonA. (2001). Does teacher certification matter? Evaluating the evidence [Electronic version]. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(1), 57–77.
EarleyD. L., GoldbergM. L., & HuieK. K. (2005, February 23–25). Preparing quality teachers: A comparison of traditional and alternative teacher preparation programs. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, Washington, DC.
10.
ErinJ. N., HolbrookC., SanspreeM. J., & SwallowR. M. (2006). Professional preparation and certification of teachers of students with visual impairments.Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
George Lucas Educational Foundation. (n.d.). Linda-Darling Hammond on teacher preparation. Retrieved June 21, 2007, from http://www.edutopia.org/node/832
13.
HuebnerK. M., Merk-AdamB., StrykerD., & WolffeK. (2004). The national agenda for the education of children and youths with visual impairments, including those with multiple disabilities.New York: AFB Press.
14.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. (2004). P.L. 108–446 (2004, December 3), 20 U. S. C. §§ 1400 et seq.
15.
International Reading Association. (2000). Resolution on teacher certification in the United States.Newark, DE: Author.
16.
JusticeM., GreinerC., & AndersonS. (2003). Determining the influence of traditional Texas teachers vs. teachers in the emergency teaching certification program [Electronic version]. Education, 124, 376–389.
17.
KoenigA. J., & HolbrookM. C. (2000). Literacy skills. In KoenigA. J., & HolbrookM. C. (Eds.), Foundations of education: Vol. 2. Instructional strategies for teaching children and youths with visual impairments (2nd ed., pp. 264–329). New York: AFB Press.
18.
LutzF. W., & HuttonJ. B. (1989). Alternative teacher certification: Its policy implications for classroom and personnel practice. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11, 237–154.
19.
MasonC., & DavidsonR. (2000). National plan for training personnel to serve children with blindness and low vision.Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
20.
McMurrerJ. (2006). The “no child left behind” definition of highly qualified teachers: Summary and principal ideas from a roundtable discussion.Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.
21.
MüllerE., & BurdetteP. (2007). Highly qualified teachers and special education: Several state approaches. Project Forum.Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education.
22.
National Center for Education Information. (2005). Profile of alternate route teachers.Washington, DC: Author.
23.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (2002). P.L. 107–110 (January 8, 2002), 20 U.S.C. §§ 6301 et seq.
24.
SpunginS. J., & FerrellK. A. (2007). The role and function of the teacher of students with visual impairments.Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
WaymanJ. C., FosterA. M., Mantle-BromleyC., & WilsonC. (2003). A comparison of the professional concerns of traditionally prepared and alternatively licensed new teachers [Electronic version]. High School Journal, 86(3), 35–41.
27.
WilsonS. M., FlodenR. E., & Ferrini-MundyJ. (2001, February). Teacher preparation research: Current knowledge, gaps, and recommendations.A research report prepared for the U.S. Department of Education by the Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy in collaboration with Michigan State University. Retrieved June 20, 2007, from http://depts.washington.edu/ctpmail/PDFs/TeacherPrep-WFFM-02-2001.pdf
28.
ZirkleC., & WinegardnerA. (2005). A retention study of career-based intervention teachers in Ohio [Electronic version]. Journal of Career and Technical Education, 22(1), 55–68.
