This study assessed the viability of using microswitch clusters (combinations of microswitches) plus contingent stimulation to promote adaptive responding and to reduce aberrant behavior in two children with multiple disabilities. The results revealed that both children increased their adaptive responses, learned to perform these responses free from aberrant behavior, and maintained this level of performance three months later.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlgozzineB., BrowderD., KarvonenM., TestD. W., & WoodW. M. (2001). Effects of intervention to promote self-determination for individuals with disabilities. Review of Educational Research, 71, 219–277.
2.
BorreroJ. C., & VollmerT. R. (2002). An application of the matching law to severe problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 13–27.
3.
CrawfordM. R., & SchusterJ. W. (1993). Using microswitches to teach toy use. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 5, 349–368.
4.
DaviesS., & HastingsR. P. (2003). Computer technology in clinical psychology services for people with mental retardation: A review. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 341–352.
5.
HolburnS., NguyenD., & VietzeP. M. (2004). Computer-assisted learning for adults with profound multiple disabilities. Behavioral Interventions, 19, 25–37.
6.
KazdinA. E. (2001). Behavior modification in applied settings (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
7.
LachapelleY., WehmeyerM. L., HaelewyckM. C., CourboisY., KeithK. D., SchalockR., VerdugoM. A., & WalshP. N. (2005). The relationship between quality of life and self-determination: An international study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49, 740–744.
8.
LancioniG. E., O'ReillyM. F., SinghN. N., OlivaD., PiazzollaG., PiraniP., & GroenewegJ. (2002). Evaluating the use of multiple microswitches and responses for children with multiple disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 46, 346–351.
9.
LancioniG. E., O'ReillyM. F., SinghN. N., SigafoosJ., OlivaD., BaccaniS., & GroenewegJ. (2006). Microswitch clusters promote adaptive responses and reduce finger mouthing in a boy with multiple disabilities. Behavior Modification, 30, 892–900.
10.
LancioniG. E., SinghN. N., O'ReillyM. F., OlivaD., ScaliniL., & GroenewegJ. (2004). Improving assisted ambulation in a man with multiple disabilities through the use of a microswitch cluster. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 32, 245–249.
11.
LancioniG. E., SinghN. N., O'ReillyM. F., SigafoosJ., OlivaD., PidalaS., PiazzollaG., & BoscoA. (in press). Promoting adaptive foot movements and reducing hand mouthing and eye poking in a boy with multiple disabilities through micro-switch technology. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy.
12.
LancioniG. E., SmaldoneA., O'ReillyM. F., SinghN. N., SigafoosJ., OlivaD., & BoscoA. (in press). Promoting adaptive hand responding and reducing face hiding in a woman with profound developmental disabilities using microswitch technology. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy.
13.
LuiselliJ. K. (1998). Treatment of self-injurious hand-mouthing in a child with multiple disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 10, 167–174.
14.
MechlingL. C. (2006). Comparison of the effects of three approaches on the frequency of stimulus activations, via a single switch, by students with profound intellectual disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 40, 94–102.
15.
MorseA. R., TeresiJ., RosenthalB., HolmesD., & YatzkanE. S. (2004). Visual acuity assessment in persons with dementia. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 98, 560–566.
16.
ParetteH. P., BrothersonM. J., & Blake HuerM. (2000). Giving families a voice in augmentative and alternative communication decision-making. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35, 177–190.
17.
RichardsS. B., TaylorR. L., RamasamyR., & RichardsR. Y. (1999). Single subject research: Applications in educational and clinical settings.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
18.
RipatJ., & BoothA. (2005). Characteristics of assistive technology service delivery models: Stakeholder perspectives and preferences. Disability and Rehabilitation, 27, 1461–1470.
19.
SakaiS., HirayamaK., IwasakiS., YamadoriA., SatoN., ItoA., KatoM., SudoM., & TsuburayaK. (2002). Contrast sensitivity of patients with severe motor and intellectual disabilities and cerebral visual impairment. Journal of Child Neurology, 17, 731–737.
20.
SaloviitaT., & PennanenM. (2003). Behavioural treatment of thumb sucking of a boy with fragile X syndrome in the classroom. Developmental Disabilities Bulletin, 31, 1–10.
21.
SiegelS., & CastellanN. J. (1988). Non-parametric statistics (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
22.
SipersteinG. N., LeffertJ. S., & WidamanK. (1996). Social behavior and the social acceptance and rejection of children with mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 31, 271–281.
23.
VermeerA., LijnseM., & LindhoutM. (2004). Measuring perceived competence and social acceptance in individuals with intellectual disabilities. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 19, 283–300.
24.
WehmeyerM., & SchwartzM. (1998). The relationship between self-determination and quality of life for adults with mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 33, 3–12.
