This study compared participants who were congenitally visually impaired and those who became visually impaired later in life in a spatial memory task. The latter showed less efficient visuospatial processes than did the former. However, these differences were of a quantitative nature only, indicating common cognitive mechanisms that can be clearly differentiated from those of people who are congenitally blind.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArnoP., VanlierdeA., StreelE., Wanet-DefalqueM. C., Sanabria-BohorquezS., & VeraartC. (2001). Auditory substitution of vision: Pattern recognition by the blind. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 509–519.
2.
BakerC. I., PeliE., KnoufN., & Kan-wisherN. G. (2005). Reorganization of visual processing in macular degeneration. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 614–618.
3.
BigelowA. E. (1996). Blind and sighted children's spatial knowledge of their home environments. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 19, 797–816.
4.
BlancoF., & TraviesoD. (2003). Haptic exploration and mental estimation of distances in a fictitious island: From mind's eye to mind's hand. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 97, 298–300.
5.
BüchelC., PriceC., FrackowiakR. S., & FristonK. (1998). Different activation patterns in the visual cortex of late and congenitally blind subjects. Brain, 121, 409–419.
6.
ByrneR. W., & SalterE. (1983). Distance and directions in the cognitive maps of the blind. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 37, 293–299.
7.
CohenL. G., CelnikP., Pascual-LeoneA., CorwellB., FaizL., DambrosiaJ., HondaM., SadatoN., GerloffC., CatalaM. D., & HallettM. (1997). Functional relevance of cross-modal plasticity in blind humans. Nature, 389, 180–183.
8.
CohenL. G., WeeksR. A., SadatoN., CelnikP., IshiiK., & HallettM. (1999). Period of susceptibility for cross-modal plasticity in the blind. Annals of Neurology, 45, 451–460.
9.
CollignonO., RenierL., BruyerR., TranduyD., & VeraartC. (2006). Improved selective and divided spatial attention in early blind subjects. Brain Research, 1075, 175–182.
10.
CornoldiC., BertuccelliB., RocchiP., & SbranaB. (1993). Processing capacity limitations in pictorial and spatial representations in the totally congenitally blind. Cortex, 29, 675–689.
11.
CornoldiC., CortesiA., & PretiD. (1991). Individual differences in the capacity limitation of visuo-spatial short-term memory: Research on sighted and totally congenitally blind people. Memory and Cognition, 19, 459–468.
12.
CornoldiC., & VecchiT. (2003). Visuo-spatial working memory and individual differences: Essays in cognitive psychology.Hove, England: Psychology Press.
13.
De VolderA. G., ToyamaH., KimuraY., KiyosawaM., NakanoH., VanlierdeA., Wanet-DefalqueM. C., MishinaM., OdaK., IshiwataK., & SendaM. (2001). Auditory triggered mental imagery of shape involves visual association areas in early blind humans. NeuroImage, 14, 129–139.
14.
DespresO., CandasV., & DufourA. (2005). The extent of visual deficit and auditory spatial compensation: Evidence from self-positioning from auditory cues. Cognitive Brain Research, 23(2-3), 444–447.
EastonR. D., SrinivasK., & GreeneA. J. (1997). Do vision and haptics share common representations—Implicit and explicit memory within and between modalities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 23, 153–163.
17.
FiegerA., RöderB., Teder-SälejärviW., HillyardS. A., & NevilleH. J. (2006). Auditory spatial tuning in late-onset blindness in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 149–157.
18.
FortinM., VossP., RainvilleC., LassondeM., & LeporeF. (2006). Impact of vision on the development of topographical orientation abilities. NeuroReport, 17, 443–446.
19.
GaunetF., MartinezJ. L., & Thinus-BlancC. (1997). Early-blind subjects’ spatial representation of manipulatory space: Exploratory strategies and reaction to change. Perception, 26, 345–366.
20.
GaunetF., & RossettiY. (2006). Effects of visual deprivation on space representation: Immediate and delayed pointing toward memorised proprioceptive targets. Perception, 35, 107–124.
21.
HellerM. A. (1989). Picture and pattern perception in the sighted and blind: The advantage of the late blind. Perception, 18, 379–389.
22.
HellerM. A., BrackettD. D., ScroggsE., AllenA. C., & GreenS. (2001). Haptic perception of the horizontal by blind and low vision individuals. Perception, 30, 601–610.
23.
HellerM. A., BrackettD. D., ScroggsE., SteffenH., HeatherlyK., & SalikS. (2002). Tangible pictures: Viewpoint effects and linear perspective in visually impaired people. Perception, 31, 747–769.
24.
HellerM. A., WilsonK., SteffenH., YoneyamaK., & BrackettD. D. (2003). Superior haptic perceptual selectivity in late-blind and very-low-vision subjects. Perception, 32, 499–511.
25.
HermanJ. F., ChatmanS. P., & RothS. F. (1983). Cognitive mapping in blind people: Acquisition of spatial relationships in a large-scale environment. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 77, 161–166.
26.
HollinsM. (1989). Understanding blindness.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
HübelD. H., & WieselT. N. (1977). Functional architecture of macaque monkey visual cortex. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 198, 1–59.
28.
ImbiribaL. A., RodriguesE. C., MagalhãesJ., & VargasC. D. (2006). Motor imagery in blind subjects: The influence of the previous visual experience. Neuroscience Letters, 400, 181–185.
29.
LanzenbergerR., UhlF., WindischbergerC., GartusA., StreiblB., EdwardV., MoserE., DeeckeL., & BeisteinerR. (2001). Cross-modal plasticity in congenitally blind subjects. Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 9, 670. Retrieved April 5, 2007, from http://cds.ismrn.org/ismrm-2001/PDF3/0670.pdf
30.
LessardN., ParéM., LeporeF., & LassondeM. (1998). Early-blind human subjects localize sound sources better than sighted subjects. Nature, 395, 278–280.
31.
LoomisJ. M., KlatzkyR. L., GolledgeR. G., CicinelliJ. G., PellegrinoJ. W., & FryP. A. (1993). Nonvisual navigation by blind and sighted: Assessment of path integration ability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 73–91.
32.
MarchantB., & MalloyT. (1984). Auditory, tactile and visual imagery in PA learning by congenitally blind, deaf, and normal adults. Journal of Mental Imagery, 8, 19–32.
33.
MillarS., & Al-AttarZ. (2005). What aspects of vision facilitate haptic processing?Brain and Cognition, 59, 258–268.
34.
PietriniP., FureyM. L., RicciardiE., GobbiniM. I., WuW. H. C., CohenL., GuazzelliM., & HaxbyJ. V. (2004). Beyond sensory images: Object-based representation in the human ventral pathway. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 101, 5658–5663.
35.
RöderB., StockO., BienS., NevilleH., & RöslerF. (2002). Speech processing activates visual cortex in congenitally blind adults. European Journal of Neuroscience, 16, 930–936.
36.
SadatoN., Pascual-LeoneA., GrafmanJ., DeiberM. P., IbanezV., & HallettM. (1998). Neural networks for braille reading by the blind. Brain, 121, 1213–1229.
37.
SadatoN., Pascual-LeoneA., GrafmanJ., IbanezV., DeiberM.-P., DoldG., & HallettM. (1996). Activation of the primary visual cortex by braille reading in blind subjects. Nature, 380, 526–528.
38.
SadatoN., OkadaT., HondaM., & YonekuraY. (2002). Critical period for cross-modal plasticity in blind humans: A functional MRI study. Neuroimage, 16, 389–400.
39.
SmirnakisS. M., BrewerA. A., SchmidM. C., ToliasA. S., SchüzA., AugathM., InhoffenW., WandellB. A., & LogothetisN. K. (2005). Lack of long-term cortical reorganization after macaque retinal lesions. Nature, 435, 300–307.
40.
SteinB. E., & MeredithM. A. (1993). The merging of the senses.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41.
SunnessJ. S., LiuT., & YantisS. (2004). Retinotopic mapping of the visual cortex using functional magnetic resonance imaging in a patient with central scotomas from atrophic macular degeneration. Ophthalmology, 111, 1595–1598.
42.
Thinus-BlancC., & GaunetF. (1997). Representation of space in blind persons: Vision as a spatial sense?Psychological Bulletin, 121, 20–42.
43.
TintiC., AdenzatoM., TamiettoM., & CornoldiC. (2006). Visual experience is not necessary for efficient survey spatial cognition: Evidence from blindness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1306–1328.
44.
Trauzettel-KlosinskiS. (2002). Reading disorders due to visual field defects: A neuro-ophthalmological view. Neuro-Ophthalmology, 27, 79–90.
45.
UngarS. (2000). Cognitive mapping without visual experience. In KitchinR., & FreundschuhS. (Eds.), Cognitive mapping: Past, present and future (pp. 221–248). London: Routledge.
46.
VanlierdeA., & Wanet-DefalqueM. C. (2004). Abilities and strategies of blind and sighted subjects in visuo-spatial imagery. Acta Psychologica, 116, 205–222.
47.
VanlierdeA., & Wanet-DefalqueM. C. (2005). The role of visual experience in mental imagery. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 99, 165–178.
VecchiT., CattaneoZ., MonegatoM., PeceA., CornoldiC., & PietriniP. (2006). Why Cyclops could not compete with Ulysses: Monocular vision and mental images. NeuroReport, 17, 723–736.
50.
VecchiT., MonticelliM. L., & CornoldiC. (1995). Visuo-spatial working memory: Structures and variables affecting a capacity measure. Neuropsychologia, 33, 1549–1564.
51.
VecchiT., TintiC., & CornoldiC. (2004). Spatial memory and integration processes in congenital blindness. NeuroReport, 15, 2787–2790.
52.
WolffeM. (1995). Role of peripheral vision in terms of critical perception—Its relevance to the visually impaired. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 15, 471–474.
53.
World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability, and health.Geneva: Author.
54.
ZuidhoekS., KappersA. M. L., NoordzijM. L., Van der LubbeR. H. J., & PostmaA. (2004). Frames of reference in a haptic parallelity task: Temporal dynamics and the possible role of vision. In BallesterosS., & HellerM. A. (Eds.), Touch, blindness and neuroscience (pp. 155–164). Madrid: UNED Press.
