A path-following experiment, using a global positioning system, was conducted with participants who were legally blind. On- and off-course confirmations were delivered by either a vibrotactile or an audio stimulus. These simple binary cues were sufficient for guidance and point to the need to offer output options for guidance systems for people who are visually impaired.
ErtanS., LeeC., WilletsA., TanH., & PentlandA. (1998). A wearable haptic navigation guidance system. Second International Symposium on Wearable Computers: Digest of papers, October 19–20, 1998 (pp. 164–165). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
3.
GolledgeR. G., KlatzkyR. L., LoomisJ. M., SpeigleJ., & TietzJ. (1998). A geographical information system for a GPS-based personal guidance system. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 12, 727–749.
4.
GolledgeR. G., LoomisJ. M., KlatzkyR. L., FluryA., & YangX. L. (1991). Designing a personal guidance system to aid navigation without sight: Progress on the GIS component. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 5, 373–396.
5.
GolledgeR. G., MarstonJ. R., LoomisJ. M., & KlatzkyR. L. (2004). Stated preferences for components of a personal guidance system for nonvisual navigation. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 98, 135–147.
6.
KlatzkyR. L., MarstonJ. R., GiudiceN. A., GolledgeR. G., & LoomisJ. M. (2006). Cognitive load of navigating without vision when guided by virtual sound versus spatial language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 12, 223–232.
7.
LoomisJ. M. (1985). Digital map and navigation system for the visually impaired. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Santa Barbara.
8.
LoomisJ. M., GolledgeR. G., & KlatzkyR. L. (1998). Navigation system for the blind: Auditory display modes and guidance. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7, 193–203.
9.
LoomisJ. M., MarstonJ. R., GolledgeR. G., & KlatzkyR. L. (2005). Personal guidance system for people with visual impairment: Comparison of spatial displays for route guidance. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 99, 219–232.
10.
MarstonJ. R., LoomisJ. M., KlatzkyR. L., GolledgeR. G., & SmithE. L. (2006). Evaluation of spatial displays for navigation without sight. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 3, 110–124.
11.
NFB Access Technology Staff. (2006). GPS technology for the blind, a product evaluation. Braille Monitor, 49, 101–108.
12.
RossD. A., & BlaschB. B. (2002). Development of a wearable computer orientation system. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 6, 49–63.
13.
Van ErpJ. B. F., Van VeenH. A. H. C., JansenC., & DobbinsT. (2005). Waypoint navigation with a vibrotactile waist belt. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 2, 106–117.
14.
WalkerB. N., & LindsayJ. (2003). Effect of beacon sounds on navigation performance in a virtual reality environment.Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD2003), Boston, MA (July 6–9). Retrieved March 1, 2007, from http//sonify.psych.gatech.edu/publications/pdfs/2003ICAD-WalkerLindsay-Beacons.pdf
WalkerB. N., & LindsayJ. (2006). Navigation performance with a virtual auditory display: Effects of beacon sound, capture radius, and practice. Human Factors, 48, 265–278.
