This article demonstrates the use of the Diagnostic Intervention Model in everyday practice and the effects of its application in a case study of Kris and his educator using individual coaching. The implications of the case for everyday practice are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AxelrodC. (2004, Fall). Supporting high quality interactions with students who are deafblind. Part one: A summary of current research. See/Hear, pp. 11–16.
2.
AxelrodC. (2005, Winter). Supporting high quality interactions with students who are deafblind. Part two: Research to practice. See/Hear, pp. 32–64.
3.
DaelmanM., NafstadA., RødbroeI., SouriauJ., & VisserA. (1996). Social interaction and the emergence of communication.London: DbI-European Working Group on Communication.
4.
De BruynE. E. J., PameijerN. K., RuijssenaarsA. J. J. M., & van AarleE. J. M. (1995). Diagnostische besluitvorming. Hand leiding bij het doorlopen van de diagnostische cyclus [Diagnostic decision making. Manual to go through the diagnostic cycle]. Leuven, Belgium: Acco.
5.
DekkerT., & BiemansH. (1994). Video-hometraining in gezinnen [Video home training in families]. Houten, the Netherlands: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum.
6.
JanssenM. J., Riksen-WalravenJ. M., & van DijkJ. P. M. (2003a). Contact: Effects of an intervention program to foster harmonious interaction between deaf-blind children and their educators. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 97, 215–229.
7.
JanssenM. J., Riksen-WalravenJ. M., & van DijkJ. P. M. (2003b). Toward a diagnostic intervention model for fostering harmonious interactions between deaf-blind children and their educators. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 97, 197–214.
8.
JanssenM. J., Riksen-WalravenJ. M., & van DijkJ. P. M. (2004). Enhancing the interactive competence of deafblind children: Do intervention effects endure?Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 16(1), 73–94.
9.
JanssenM., van den TillaartB., van der HeijdenI., van DuijnhovenA., & van SonN. (2002). Contact: Implementatiestudie van een interventieprogramma ter bevordering van de interactie tussen doofblinde kinderen en hun opvoeders [Contact: Implementation study of an intervention program for improving interactions between deaf-blind children and their educators]. Sint-Michielsgestel, the Netherlands: IvD/MTW.
10.
MartensM., & JanssenM. (2003). Opleidingsplan Interactieen Communica-tiebegeleider Doofblinden [Education plan interaction and deaf-blind-specific communication coach]. Sint-Michielsgestel, the Netherlands: Viataal.
11.
MartensM., JanssenH., & Van den TillaartB. (2003). Module Interactie Doofblinden [Module interaction deafblind-specific].Sint-Michielsgestel, the Netherlands: Viataal.
12.
MartensM., Van de VenG., & JanssenH. (2003). Interaction guided positively supporting employees in their communication with deafblind people. How video analysis improves communication between deaf-blind people and their environment.Paper presented at the World Conference on Deaf-blindness, Toronto. Sint-Michielsgestel, the Netherlands: Viataal.
13.
MartensM., & Van den BurgC. (2005). A systematic approach to improve interaction: From research to practice. Paper presented at the sixth DbI European conference on Deafblindness, Presov, Slovakia.
14.
MenkeR., & ZondervanK. (2005). Intervention Research Project communication groups. Paper presented at the sixth DbI European conference on Deafblindness, Presov, Slovakia.
15.
RowlandC., & SchweigertP. (1997). Overcoming helplessness: Hands-on problem solving skills for children with deafblindness, final report.Vancouver: Washington State University.
16.
TrevarthenC. (1993). The function of emotions in early infant communication and development. In NadelJ., & CamioniL. (Eds.), New perspectives in communicative development (pp. 48–81). London: Rout-ledge.
17.
Van den TillaartB. (1998). Cursus Wederzijdse Interactie en Opleidingsmodel [Course reciprocal interaction and education model]. Sint-Michielsgestel, the Netherlands: Viataal.
18.
Van den TillaartB. (2000). Encouraging reciprocity in interaction between deafblind people and their partners. DbI Review, 25, 6–9.
19.
Van den TillaartB. (2001). Model-based support to improve quality of interaction. 5th DbI European Conference on Deafblindness, Noordwijkerhout.Sint-Michielgestel, the Netherlands: Instituut voor Doven/Mgr. Terwindtstichting.
20.
Van den TillaartB., & JanssenM. (2004). Contact: Specific interaction characteristics to build reciprocal interaction with congenital deafblind persons. (CD-ROM). (Available from Centrum voor Expertise, Viataal, Theerestraat 42, 5271 GD Sint-Michielsgestel, the Netherlands: e-mail: <centrumvoorexpertise@viataal.nl>.)
21.
VervloedM. P. J., van DijkR. J. M., KnoorsH., & van DijkJ. P. M. (in press). Interaction between teacher and congenitally deaf-blind child. American Annals for the Deaf.
22.
WeinerA., KuppermintzH., & GuttmanD. (1994, December). Video Home Training (the Orion Project): A short-term preventive and treatment intervention for families with young children. Family Process, 33, 441–453.