The variability of the length and frequency of steps was measured in sighted and visually impaired walkers at three different paces. The variability was low, especially at the preferred pace, and similar for both groups. A model incorporating step counts and step frequency provides good estimates of the distance traveled. Applications to wayfinding technology are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
DanionF., VarraineE., BonnardM., & PailhousJ. (2003). Stride variability in human gait: The effect of stride frequency and stride length. Gait and Posture, 18, 69–77.
2.
GuthD., & LaDukeR. (1995). Veering by blind pedestrians: Individual differences and their implications for instruction. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 89, 28–37.
3.
InmanV. T., RalstonH. J., & ToddF. (1981). Human walking.Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
4.
LoomisJ. M., GolledgeR. G., & KlatzkyR. L. (1998). Navigation system for the blind: Auditory display modes and guidance. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7, 193–203.
5.
LoomisJ. M., GolledgeR. G., KlatzkyR. L., SpeigleJ. M., & TietzJ. (1994). Personal guidance system for the visually impaired. Proceedings of the First Annual ACM/SIGGAPH Conference on Assistive Technologies (pp. 85–91). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
6.
NakamuraT. (1997). Quantitative analysis of gait in the visually impaired. Disability and Rehabilitation, 19, 194–197.
7.
RamseyV. K., BlaschB. B., KitaA., & JohnsonB. F. (1999). A biomechanical evaluation of visually impaired persons’ gait and long-cane mechanics. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 36, 323–332.
8.
SekiyaP. T., NagasakiH., ItoH., & FurunaT. (1997). Optimal walking in terms of variability in step length. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 26, 266–272.
