This article reviews the literature on the various components of long canes and reports on a study of the knowledge and preferences of 100 adults with visual impairments regarding the various components and types of canes. Results indicated that the terrain of a route, weather conditions, mobility demand, and purpose of an outing are important factors when choosing a cane.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AltmanJ. T., & LaGrowS. J. (1996). Point/counterpoint. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 90, 292–295.
BickfordT. (1993). Care and feeding of the long white cane: Instructions in cane travel for blind people.Baltimore, MD: National Federation of the Blind.
4.
BlaschB. B., LaGrowS. J., & De l'AuneW. R. (1996). Three aspects of coverage provided by the long cane: Object, surface, and foot-placement preview. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 90, 295–301.
5.
ElliottJ. L. (1992). Evaluation of the Americane: A telescoping long cane for the visually impaired. RE: view;23(4), 190–193.
6.
ElliottJ. L., & KuykT. K. (1992). Evaluation of the Wayne Walsh Safe-T-Lite cane. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 86, 373–375.
7.
FarmerL. W., & SmithD. L. (1997). Adaptive technology. In BlaschB. B., WeinerW. R., & WelshR. L. (Eds.), Foundations of orientation and mobility (2nd ed., pp. 231–283). New York: AFB Press.
8.
FiskS. (1986). Constant-contact technique with a modified tip: A new alternative for long-cane mobility. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 80, 999–1000.
9.
FranckL. (1990). Effect of a cane with mi-croprism reflecting tape on the nighttime visibility of blind rural travelers. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 84, 8–10.
10.
HoepflM. C. (1997, Fall). Choosing qualitative research: A primer for technology education researchers. Journal of Technology, 9, 12–39.
11.
LaGrowS. J., KjeldstadA., & LewandowskiE. (1988). The effects of cane-tip design on three aspects of nonvisual travel. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 82, 13–16.
12.
LincolnY. S., & GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry.London: Sage.
13.
ShellingerhoutR., BongersR.M., van GrinsvenR., SmitsmanA.W., & van GalenG. P. (2001). Improving obstacle detection by redesign of walking canes for blind persons. Ergonomics, 44, 513–522.
