This study evaluated the effects of providing comprehensive low vision services to elderly persons with visual impairments in New Zealand. The 93 participants were matched on age, gender, and visual function with 93 who did not have access to comprehensive low vision services. No significant differences were found between the groups at posttest and follow-up on the three primary dependent variables of visual function, instrumental activities of daily living, and quality of life.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BranchL. G., HorowitzA., & CarrC. (1989). The implications for everyday life of incident self-reported visual decline among people over age 65 living in the community. The Gerontologist, 29, 359–365.
2.
BrennanM., & SilverstoneB. (2000). Developmental perspectives on aging and vision loss. In SilverstoneB., LangM. A., RosenthalB. P., & FayeE. E. (Eds.), The Lighthouse handbook on vision impairment and vision rehabilitation (pp. 409–429). New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
CampbellD.X., & StanleyJ. C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research.Chicago: Rand McNally.
4.
CrewsJ. E. (1991). Measuring rehabilitation outcomes and public policies on aging and blindness. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 17, 137–151.
5.
CrewsJ. E. (2000). The evolution of public policies and services for older people who are visually impaired. In SilverstoneB., LangM. A., RosenthalB. P., & FayeE. E. (Eds.), The Lighthouse handbook on vision impairment and vision rehabilitation (pp. 1287–1300). New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
DavisC., Lovie-KitchinI, & ThompsonB. (1995). Psychological adjustment to age-related macular degeneration. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 89, 16–27.
7.
ElliottJ. L., & KuykT. K. (1994). Self-reported functional and psychosocial outcomes of blind rehabilitation. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 88, 207–212.
8.
EngelR. J., WelshR. L., & LewisL. J. (2000). Improving the well-being of vision impaired older adults through orientation and mobility training and rehabilitation: An evaluation. RE:view, 32, 67–76.
9.
FagerstromR. (1994). Self-image of elderly persons before and after cataract surgery. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 88, 458–461.
10.
GoodrichG. L., & BaileyI. L. (2000). A history of the field of vision rehabilitation from the perspective of low vision. In SilverstoneB., LangM. A., RosenthalB. P., & FayeE. E. (Eds.), The Lighthouse handbook on vision impairment and vision rehabilitation (pp. 671–674). New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
HeadD., BabcockJ., GoodrichG., & Boy-lessJ. (2000). A geriatric assessment of functional status in vision rehabilitation. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 94, 357–371.
12.
Health Funding Authority. (1998). Disability in New Zealand: Overview of the 1996/1997 Surveys.Wellington: Ministry of Health.
13.
HorowitzA., LeonardR., & ReinhardtJ. (2000). Measuring psychological and functional outcomes of a group model of vision rehabilitation services for older adults. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 94, 328–337.
14.
KatzJ., & TielschJ. M. (1996). Visual function and visual acuity in an urban adult population. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 90, 367–377.
15.
KleinR., MossS. E., KleinB. E. K., GutierrezP., & MangioneC. M. (2001). The NEI-VFQ-25 in people with long-term Type I diabetes mellitus. Archives of Ophthalmology, 119, 733–740.
16.
LaForgeR. G., SpectorW. E., & SternbergJ. (1992). The relationship of vision and hearing impairment to one-year mortality and functional decline. Journal of Aging and Health, 4, 126–148.
17.
LindoG., & NordholmL. (1999). Adaptation strategies, well-being, and activities of daily living among people with low vision. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 93, 434–441.
MangioneC.M., LeeP. P., GutierrezP. R., SpritzerK., BerryS., & HaysR. D. (2001). Development of the 25-Item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. Archives of Ophthalmology, 119, 1050–1058.
20.
MargolisM. K., CoyneK., Kennedy-MartinT., BakerT., ScheinO., & RevickiD. A. (2002). Vision-specific instruments for the assessment of health related quality of life and visual function: A literature review. Pharmacoeconomics, 20, 791–812.
21.
RubinG. S. (2000). Perceptual correlates of optical disorders of middle and later life. In SilverstoneB., LangM. A., RosenthalB. P., & FayeE. E. (Eds.), The Lighthouse handbook on vision impairment and vision rehabilitation (pp. 249–261). New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
RudbergM. A., FurnerS. E., DunnJ. E., & CasselC. K. (1993). The relationship of visual and hearing impairment to disability: An analysis using the Longitudinal Study of Aging. Journal of Gerontology: Medical Science, 48, M261–M268.
23.
SchwartzS. D. (2000). Age-related maculopathy and age-related macular degeneration. In SilverstoneB., LangM. A., RosenthalB. P., & FayeE. E. (Eds.), The Lighthouse handbook on vision impairment and vision rehabilitation (pp. 83–101). New York: Oxford University Press.
24.
StuenC. (2000). Vision and aging: Challenges for rehabilitation. In SilverstoneB., LangM. A., RosenthalB. P., & FayeE. E. (Eds.), The Lighthouse handbook on vision impairment and vision rehabilitation (pp. 1301–1314). New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
TielschJ. M. (2000). The epidemiology of vision impairment. In SilverstoneB., LangM. A., RosenthalB. P., & FayeE. E. (Eds.), The Lighthouse handbook on vision impairment and vision rehabilitation (pp. 5–17). New York: Oxford University Press.
