This article describes federal and state laws that affect the opportunity of people with low vision to drive and to obtain driver's licenses. Discrimination against individuals with low vision is discussed in the context of equal protection and the Americans with Disabilities Act. A review of relevant case law and implications for drivers with low vision are presented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Albertson's Inc. v. Kirkingburg, 527 U.S. 555 (1999).
2.
American Academy of Ophthalmology. (2001). Vision requirements for driving policy.San Francisco: Author.
3.
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. (2003).
4.
AppelS., BrilliantR., & ReichL. (1990). Driving with visual impairment: Facts and issues. Journal of Vision Rehabilitation, 4, 19–31.
5.
Bailey v. Anderson, 79 F.Supp.2d 1254, D. Kan. (1999).
City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, 473 U.S. 432 (1985).
9.
ChemerinskyE. (2002). Constitutional law: Principles and policies (2nd ed.). New York: Aspen Law & Business.
10.
Chenoweth v. Hillsborough County, 250 F.3d 1328 (11th Cir. 2001), cert. denied 534 U.S. 1131 (2002).
11.
D'AgostinoT. (1996). Litigating ADA claims: Forms, pleadings and practical guidance.Horsham, PA: LRP.
12.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2003). Regulations to implement the equal employment provisions of the ADA, 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2(m); 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2(o)(i) and (ii); 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2(p) (2) (v), (2003); 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2(i), 2003.Washington, DC: Author.
13.
FeinbloomW. (1977). Driving with bioptic telescopic spectacles (BTS). American Journal of Optometry & Physiological Optics, 54, 35–42.
14.
Gooch v. Iowa Department of Transportation, 398 N.W. 2d 845 (Iowa, 1987).
15.
GuntherG. (1972). Foreword. In search of evolving doctrine on the changing court: A model for a newer equal protection. Harvard Law Review, 86, 1–48.
16.
Heller v. Doe, 509 U.S. 312, (1993).
17.
HussC. P. (1988). Model approach—Low vision driver's training and assessment. Journal of Vision Rehabilitation, 2, 31–44.
18.
JankeM. K. (1983). Accident rates of drivers with bioptic telescopic lenses. Journal of Safety Research, 14, 159–165.
19.
KorbD. (1970). Preparing the visually handicapped person for motor vehicle operation. American Journal of Optometry, 47, 619–628.
20.
Lewis v. Metro. Transit Comm'n, 320 N.W.2d 426 (Minn., 1982).
21.
LippmanO., CornA. L., & LewisM. C. (1988). Bioptic telescopic spectacles and driving performance: A study in Texas. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 82, 182–187.
22.
McGwinG., ChapmanV., & OwsleyC. (2000). Visual risk factors for driving difficulty among older drivers. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 32, 735–744.
MN Department of Public Safety, driver information, licensing and testing, MN Rule 7410.2400 (2003).
25.
New York City Transit Authority v. Beazer, 440 U.S. 568 (1979).
26.
OwsleyC., & McGwinG. (1999). Vision impairment and driving. Survey of Ophthalmology, 43, 535–550.
27.
OwsleyC., McGwinG., & BallK. (1998). Vision impairment, eye disease, and injurious motor vehicle crashes in the elderly. Ophthalmic Epidemiology, 5, 101–103.
28.
OwsleyC., StalveyB. T., WellsJ., SloaneM. E., & McGwinG. (2001). Visual risk factors for crash involvement in older drivers with cataract. Archives of Ophthalmology, 119, 881–887.
29.
ParkW. L., UnatinJ., & ParkJ. M. (1995). A profile of the demographics, training and driving history of telescopic drivers in the state of Michigan. Journal of the American Optometric Association, 66, 274–280.
30.
PeliE., & PeliD. (2002). Driving with confidence.London: World Scientific.
31.
Sharon v. Larson, 650 F.Supp. 1396, 1398 (E.D. Pa. 1986).
32.
Sklar v. PA D.O.T. Bureau of Driver Licensing, 764 A.2d 632, (1999).
33.
Sutton v. United Airlines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471 (1999).
34.
SzlykJ. P., SeipleW., LadermanD. J., KelschR., StelmackJ., & McMahonT. (2000). Measuring the effectiveness of bioptic telescopes for persons with central vision loss. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 37, 101–108.
35.
Toyota Motor Mfg., Kentucky, Inc. v. Williams, 534 U.S. 184 (2002).
36.
U.S. Department of Justice. (2003a). Nondiscrimination on the basis of disability in state and local government services, 28 C.F.R. § 35.130(b)(7) (2003).
37.
U.S. Department of Justice. (2003b). Nondiscrimination on the basis of disability in state and local government services, 28 C.F.R. § 35.150(a)(3), (2003). 28 C.F.R. § 35.130(b)(6) (2003).
38.
U.S. Const. Art. IV, Sec.1.
39.
U.S. Const. Art. I, § 9.
40.
VA Motor Vehicles, Title, Titling, Registration and Licensure. VA. Code Ann. § 46.2–312 (2003).
41.
WoodJ. M., & MallonK. (2001). Comparison of driving performance of young and old drivers (with and without visual impairment) measured during in-traffic conditions. Optometry and Vision Science, 78, 343–349.
