This national study reviews national and state policies and guidelines, as well as surveys and focus groups of administrators and teachers, on the implementation of policies for students with low vision to gain visual access to the general education curriculum. The findings demonstrate that few states provide the necessary services to enable students to achieve access and that people, philosophy, and systems are the main impediments to and the solutions for change.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbnerG. H., & LahmE. A. (2002). Implementation of assistive technology with students who are visually impaired: Teachers’ readiness. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 96, 98–105.
2.
AnthonyT. L. (2000). Performing a functional low vision assessment. In D'AndreaF. M., & FarrenkopfC. (Eds.), Looking to learn: Promoting literacy for students with low vision (pp. 32–83). New York: AFB Press.
3.
BarragaN. C. (1964). Increased visual behavior in low vision children.New York: American Foundation for the Blind.
4.
BarragaN. C. (1970). Teachers’ guide for development of visual learning abilities and utilization of low vision.Louisville, KY: American Printing House for the Blind.
5.
BraceyG. W. (1998). Educational research and educational practice: Ne'er the twain shall meet?Educational Forum, 62, 140–145.
6.
ButlerS. E., CruddenA., SansingW. K., & LeJeuneB. J. (2002). Employment barriers, access to assistive technology, and research needs. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 96, 664–667.
7.
ChurchG., & GlennenS. (1992). Assistive technology program development. In ChurchG., & GlennenS. (Eds.), The handbook of assistive technology (pp. 1–26). San Diego: Singular.
8.
Committee to Develop Guidelines for Literacy. (1991). Selecting appropriate learning media for visually handicapped students. RE: view, 23(2), 64–66.
9.
CornA. L., BellJ. K., AndersenE., BachoferC., JoseR. T., & PerezA. M. (2003). Providing access to the visual environment: A model of low vision services for children. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 97, 261–272.
10.
CornA. L., HatlenP., HuebnerK. M., RyanF., & SillerM. A. (1995). The national agenda for the education of children and youths with visual impairments, including those with multiple disabilities.New York: AFB Press.
11.
CornA. L., & HuebnerK. M. (Eds.). (1998). A report to the nation: The national agenda for the education of children and youths with visual impairments, including those with multiple disabilities.New York: AFB Press.
12.
ComA. L., & KoenigA. J. (1996). Perspectives on low vision. In CornA. L., & KoenigA. J. (Eds.), Foundations of low vision: Clinical and functional perspectives (pp. 3–25). New York: AFB Press.
13.
CornA. L., & WallR. S. (2002). Multimedia presentations for students with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 96, 197–211.
14.
CornA. L., WallR. S., JoseR. T., BellJ. K., WilcoxK., & PerezA. M. (2002). An initial study of reading and comprehension rates for students receiving optical devices. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 96, 322–334.
15.
DaltonS. A. (1998). Goal 7: Access to developmental and educational services will include an assurance that instructional materials are available to students in the appropriate media and at the same time as their sighted peers. In CornA. L., & HuebnerK. M. (Eds.), A report to the nation: The national agenda for the education of children and youths with visual impairments, including those with multiple disabilities (pp. 47–49). New York: AFB Press.
16.
GoodrichG. L., & SowellV. M. (1996). Low vision: A history in progress. In CornA. L., & KoenigA. J. (Eds.), Foundations of low vision: Clinical and functional perspectives (pp. 397–414). New York: AFB Press.
17.
HeumannJ. E., & HehirT. (1999). Memorandum on policy guidance in educating blind and visually impaired students. In PughG. S., & ErinJ. (Eds.), Blind and visually impaired students: Educational service guidelines (p. 135). Watertown, MA: Perkins School for the Blind.
18.
HuebnerK. M., Merk-AdamB., StrykerD., & WolffeK. (2004). The national agenda for the education of children and youths with visual impairments, including those with multiple disabilities: Revised.New York: AFB Press.
19.
KappermanG., StickenJ., & HeinzeT. (2002). Survey of the use of assistive technology by Illinois students who are visually impaired. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 96, 106–108.
20.
KelleyD., FinleyR., KoehlerK., & PicardK. (2001). Equal access: Integrating technology into the elementary and secondary curriculum, RE: view, 33(2), 63–69.
LueckA. H. (2004). Comprehensive low vision care. In LueckA. H. (Ed.), Functional vision: A practitioner's guide to evaluation and intervention (pp. 3–24). New York: AFB Press.
23.
MasonC., & DavidsonR. (2000). National plan for training personnel to serve children with blindness and low vision.Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
24.
PlautS., & SharkeyN. S. (Eds.). (2003). Educational policy and practice: Bridging the divide {Harvard Educational Review Reprint No. 37). Boston: Harvard Education Press.
25.
PughG. S., & ErinJ. (Eds.). (1999). Blind and visually impaired students: Educational service guidelines.Watertown, MA: Perkins School for the Blind.
26.
RileyK. L., & SternB. S. (1998). Using authentic assessment and qualitative methodology to bridge theory and practice. Educational Forum, 62, 178–185.
27.
RileyR. W. (2000, June 8). Educating blind and visually impaired students: Policy guidance notice. Federal Register, 65(111), 36585–36594.
28.
RoachV., & CarusoM. G. (1997). Policy and practice: Observations and recommendations to promote inclusive practices. Education and Treatment of Children, 20, 105–121.
29.
RobertsF. K. (1986). Education for the visually handicapped: A social and educational history. In SchollG. T. (Ed.), Foundations of education for blind and visually handicapped children and youth (pp. 1–18). New York: American Foundation for the Blind.
30.
ShieldsC. M. (1995). Metaphor, model and museum: Reflections on the art of educational policy making. Journal of Educational Thought, 29, 227–242.
31.
StrykerD., HuebnerK. M., & HatlenP. (1999). A call to action: The national agenda for the education of children and youths with visual impairments, including those with multiple disabilities.Austin: Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired.
32.
VincentC., DumontC., BouchardD., & LesperanceF. (2003). Development of a standardized instrument to access the performance of computer tasks by students with low vision. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 97, 1–26.
33.
WilkinsonM. E., StuartI., & TranthamC. S. (2000). Iowa model for pediatric low vision services. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 94, 446–452.
34.
WilliamsB.T., & KatsiyannisA. (1998). The 1997 amendments: Implications for school principals. NASSP Bulletin, 82, 12–18.
