Interviews with 23 itinerant teachers of students with visual impairments in Colorado gathered information on their views of the position, the challenges they face, and ways to improve the training of future itinerant teachers. The results offer insights into the positive and negative aspects of itinerant teaching, detail essential skills for successful itinerant teaching, and provide recommendations for improving the preparation of future itinerant teachers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BinaM. J. (1987). Meeting the needs of rural teachers of visually impaired students. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 95, 204–209.
2.
BrunettiG. J. (2001). Why do they teach? A study of job satisfaction among long-term high school teachers. Teacher Education Quarterly, 28, 49–74.
3.
CornA. L., & PattersonW. (1994). The use of mobile phones by itinerant teachers of students with visual disabilities. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 88, 446–458.
4.
Darling-HammondL. (2001). The challenge of staffing our schools. Educational Leadership, 58(8), 12–17.
5.
DragoR., CaplanR., & CostanzaD. (1999). New estimates of working time for elementary school teachers. Monthly Labor Review, 122(4), 31–40.
6.
FergusonD., & RalphG. R. (1996). The changing role of special educators: A development waiting for a trend. Contemporary Education, 68, 49–51.
7.
ForeC.III, MartinC., & BenderW. N. (2002). Teacher burnout in special education: The causes and recommended solutions. High School Journal, 86(1), 36–45.
8.
GlaserB. G., & StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory.Chicago: Al-dine.
9.
HassJ. (1994). Role determinants of teachers of the visually impaired. B.C. Journal of Special Education, 18, 140–148.
10.
HazekampI, & HuebnerK. M. (Eds.). (1989). Program planning and evaluation for blind and visually impaired students: National guidelines for educational excellence.New York: American Foundation for the Blind.
11.
LucknerJ. L., & HowellJ. J. (2002). Suggestions for preparing itinerant teachers: A qualitative analysis. American Annals of the Deaf, 147(3), 54–61.
12.
LucknerJ. L., & MillerK. J. (1993). On the road again: Meeting the challenge of itinerant teaching. Perspectives in Education and Deafness, 11(4), 16–18.
13.
MerriamS. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14.
OlmsteadJ. E. (1991). Itinerant teaching: Tricks of the trade for teachers of blind and visually impaired students.New York: American Foundation for the Blind.
15.
OlmsteadJ. E. (1995a). Considerations for student placement in itinerant programs. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 89, 102–105.
16.
OlmsteadJ. E. (1995b). Itinerant personnel: A survey of caseloads and working conditions. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 89, 546–549.
17.
President's Commission on Excellence in Special Education. (2002). A new era: Revitalizing special education for children and their families.Washington, DC: Author.
18.
SpunginS. J. (2003). Cannibalism is alive and well in the blindness field. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 97, 69–72.
19.
StephensT. M., & BirchK. W. (1969). Merits for special class, resource, and itinerant plans for the teaching of partially seeing children. Exceptional Children, 35, 481–485.
20.
U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Twenty-third annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.Jessup, MD: Author.
21.
WaxmanH. C., HuangS. L., & AndersonL. (1997). Classroom process differences in inner-city elementary schools. Journal of Educational Research, 91, 49–59.
22.
YargerC., & LucknerJ. L. (1999). Itinerant teaching: The inside story. American Annals of the Deaf, 144, 309–314.
