This article reports on a self-report measure of functional independence that is being used to measure outcomes of blind rehabilitation programs in the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA). Analyses of the data have resulted in the clinical protocol that is currently in use nationally by the DVA Blind Rehabilitation Service.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BabcockJ. L. (November, 1994). Assessing the utility of retrospective pretests. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Evaluation Association, Boston.
2.
BarrettS. (1996). Measuring outcomes of services to people with disabilities: An annotated bibliography.New York: National Accreditation Council for Agencies Serving the Blind and Visually Handicapped.
3.
Bummel-SmithK. (1993). Research in rehabilitation. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, 9, 895–904.
4.
CarrollT. (1961). Blindness: What it is, what it does, how to live with it.Boston: Little, Brown.
5.
Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities. (2001). Veterans Health Administration comprehensive blind rehabilitation services standards manual.Tucson, AZ: Author.
6.
CrewsJ. E., & LongR. G. (1997). Conceptual and methodological issues in rehabilitation outcomes for adults who are visually impaired. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 91, 117–129.
7.
CroogS. H. (1997). Current issues in conceptualizing and measuring quality of life: Health-related quality of life assessment.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
8.
De HaanR., AaronsonN., LimburgM., HewerR. L., & van CrevelH. (1993). Measuring quality of life in stroke. Stroke, 24, 320–327.
9.
De l'AuneW., WelshR., and WilliamsM. D. (2000). A national outcomes assessment of the rehabilitation of adults with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 94, 281–291.
10.
De l'AuneW. R., WilliamsM. D., & WelshR. (1999). Outcome assessment of the rehabilitation of the visually impaired. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 36, 273–292.
11.
DoddsA. G. (1989). Motivation reconsidered: The importance of self-advocacy in rehabilitation. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 7, 11–15.
12.
FuhrerM.X., (1995). Conference report: An agenda for medical rehabilitation outcomes research. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation74, 243–248.
13.
GrangerC. J. (1984). A conceptual model for functional assessment. In GrangerC. V., & GreshamG. E. (Eds.), Functional assessment in rehabilitation medicine (pp. 14–25). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
14.
HartP. M., ChakravarthyU., StevensonM. R., & JamisonJ. Q. (1999). A vision specific functional index for use in patients with age related macular degeneration. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 83, 1115–1120.
15.
HaymesS. A., JohnstonA. W., & HeyesA. D. (2001). Preliminary investigation of the responsiveness of the Melbourne Low Vision ADL Index to low-vision rehabilitation. Optometry and Vision Science, 78, 373–380.
16.
HazelC. A., PetreK. L., ArmstrongR. A., BensonM. T., & FrostN. A. (2000). Visual function and subjective quality of life compared in subjects with acquired macular disease. Investigative Ophthalmology and Vision Science, 41, 1309–1315.
17.
JohnstonM. V., & GrangerC.V., (1994). Outcomes research in medical rehabilitation: A primer and introduction to a series. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 73, 296–303.
18.
KeithR. A. (1994). Functional status and health status. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 75, 478–483.
19.
KeithR. A. (1995). Conceptual basis of outcome measures. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 74, 73–80.
20.
KilgoreK. M. (1995). Measuring outcomes in post-acute continuum. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 76, SC21–SC26.
21.
LongR. G., CrewsJ. E., & MancilR. Y. (2000). Creating measures of rehabilitation outcomes for people who are blind and visually impaired. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 91, 117–130.
22.
MangioneC. M., BerryS., SpritzerK., JanzN. K., KleinR., OwsleyC., & LeeP. P. (1998). Identifying the content area for the 51-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire: Results from focus groups with visually impaired persons. Archives of Ophthalmology, 116, 227–233.
23.
MangioneC. M., PhillipsR. S., SeddonJ. M., LawrenceM. G., CookE. F., DaileyR., & GoldmanL. (1992). Development of the Activities of Daily Vision Scale: A measure of visual functional status. Medical Care, 30, 1111–1126.
24.
MartinS. R., RooseveltC. B., BullimoreM. A., & RaaschT. W. (1999). The LoVIS Study Group: The development of a battery of functional tests for low vision. Optometry and Vision Science, 76(Suppl.), 98.
25.
MassofR. W., & RubinG. S. (2001). Visual function assessment questionnaires. Survey of Ophthalmology, 45, 531–548.
26.
NewmanD. A., & HouserB. P. (1991). Visual Disability Inventory: Documenting functional impairment caused by cataract. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 17, 244–245.
27.
NieuwenhuijsenE. R., FreyW. D., & CrewsJ. E. (1991). Measuring small gains using the ICIDH Severity of Disability Scale: Assessment practice among older people who are blind. International Disability Studies, 13, 29–33.
28.
PesudovsK., & CosterD. J. (1998). An instrument for assessment of subjective visual disability in cataract patients. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 82, 617–624.
29.
SteinbergE. P., TielschJ. M., ScheinO. D., JavittJ. C., SharkeyP., CassardS. D., LegroM. W., Diener-WestM., BassE. B., DamianoA. M., SteinwachsD. M., & SommerA. (1994). The VF-14: An index of functional impairment in patients with cataract. Archives of Ophthalmology, 112, 630–638.
30.
StelmackJ. (2001). Quality of life of low-vision patients and outcomes of low-vision rehabilitation. Optometry and Vision Science, 78, 335–342.
31.
StudenskiS., & DuncanP. W. (1993). Measuring rehabilitation outcomes. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, 9, 823–829.
32.
SzlykJ. P., ArditiA., CoffeyB., BucciP. C., & LadermanD. (1990). Self-report in functional assessment of low vision. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 84, 61–66.
33.
SzlykJ. P., FishmanG. A., AlexanderK. R., RevelinsB. I., DerlackiD. J., & AndersonR. J. (1997). Relationship between difficulty in performing daily activities and clinical measures of visual function in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. Archives of Ophthalmology, 115, 53–59.
34.
TurcoP. D., ConnollyJ., McCabeP., & GlynnR. J. (1994). Assessment of Functional Vision Performance: A new test for low vision patients. Ophthalmic Epidemiology, 1, 15–25.
35.
VlahakisA. (1993). Predicting functional performance in women with low vision. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
36.
WilliamsonG. M., & SchulzR. (1995). Activity restriction mediates the association between pain and depressed affect: A study of younger and older adult cancer patients. Psychology and Aging, 10, 369–378.
37.
WolffsohnJ. S., & CochraneA. L. (2000). Design of the Low Vision Quality-of-life Questionnaire (LVQOL) and measuring the outcome of low-vision rehabilitation. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 130, 793–802.
38.
World Health Organization. (2001). Final draft: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICIDH-2).Geneva: Author.
