This article presents data from four focus groups of assistive technology (AT) computer users to understand how individuals who are blind or visually impaired gather information about AT and the kinds of information needs that they may have. Qualitative findings are reported on what the focus group participants considered to be the benefits of and barriers to computer use. This article further underscores the importance of accessibility and usability as being helpful concepts for exploring the role of technology in people's lives.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AyersE. (2000). Cyberspace, U.S.A. [Electronic version]. In LeuchtenburgW. E. (Ed.), American places: Encounters with history (pp. 1–39). New York: Oxford University Press. Available: http://www.oup-usa.com/sc/019513026X/019513026X_02.pdf
BarnicleK. (2000). Usability testing with screen reading technology in a Windows environment. Proceedings of the Conference of the California State University at Northridge Center on Disabilities. Available: http://www.csun.edu/cod/conf/2000/proceedings/0073Barnicle.htm
4.
BrunkenP. (1984, April 23–27). Independence for the visually handicapped through technology. Paper presented at the 62nd annual convention of the Council for Exceptional Children, Washington, DC.
5.
CraverJ. M., & Burton-RadzelyL. (1998). Technology links to literacy: A Case book of special educators’ use of technology to promote literacy.Calverton, MD: Macro International.
6.
CruddenA., & FireisonC. (1997). Employment retention after vision loss: Intensive case studies.Washington, DC: National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research.
7.
DenzinK., & LincolnY. S. (1998). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
FoulkeE. (1981). Impact of science and technology on the early years. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 75, 101–08.
9.
GerberE. (2002). Surfing by ear: Usability concerns of computer users who are blind or visually impaired. AccessWorld, 3, 38–43.
10.
GerberE., & KirchnerC. (2001a). Social Research on use of, and preferences for <www.medicare.gov> by people who are blind or visually impaired. Unpublished report, Department of Policy Research and Program Evaluation, American Foundation for the Blind, New York.
11.
GerberE., & KirchnerC. (2001b). Who's surfing? Internet access and computer use by visually impaired youth and adults. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 95, 176–181.
12.
JohnsonG., WolffeK., CandelaT., & StitelyJ. (2001). Wired to work: An analysis of the reported crisis in access technology training for people with visual impairments. Technical brief presented at the Josephine L. Taylor Leadership Institute, March 27, 2001.
13.
KirchnerC. (1995). Economic aspects of blindness and low vision: A new perspective. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 89, 506–513.
14.
KirchnerC., SchmeidlerE., & TodorovA. (1999). Looking at employment through a lifespan telescope: Age, health, and employment status of people with serious visual impairment.New York: American Foundation for the Blind.
15.
LongmoreP., & GoldbergerD. (2000). The league of the physically handicapped and the great depression: A case study in the new disability history. Journal of American History, 87(3), [Online]. Available: <www.historycoop.org/journals/jah/87.3/longmore.html>.
16.
MatherJ. (1994). Computers, automation, and the employment of persons who are blind or visually impaired. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 88, 544–549.
17.
National Telecommunications and Information Administration. (2000). Falling through the net: Towards digital inclusion. A report on Americans’ access to technology tools [Online]. Available: <www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fttn00/Falling.htm#61>.
18.
National Telecommunications and Information Administration. (2002). Chapter 7: Computer and Internet use among people with disabilities. In A nation online: How Americans are expanding their use of the Internet [Online]. Available: <www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/dn/html/Chapter7.htm>.
19.
NielsenJ. (2001). Beyond accessibility: Treating users with disabilities as people. Jakob Alertbox [Online]. Available: <www.useit.com/alertbox/20011111.html>.
20.
ObringerS., & KempS. (1992). The effect of computer technology by braille students on instruction time. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Knoxville, TN.
21.
PattonM. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
22.
PeltoP., & PeltoG. (1978). Anthropological research: The structure of inquiry.New York: Cambridge University Press.
23.
RossiP., & FreemanH. (1989). Evaluation: A systemic approach.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
24.
ScrimshawS. (1990). Combining quantitative and qualitative methods in the study of intra-household resource allocation. In RogersB. L., & SchlossmanN. P. (Eds.), Intra-household resource allocation: Issues and methods for development policy and planning (pp. 86–98). Tokyo: United Nations Press.
25.
SlatinJ. M., & RushS. (2003). Maximum accessibility: Making your website more usable for everyone.Boston: Addison-Wesley.
26.
SpradleyJ. P. (1980). Participant observation.New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
27.
StraussA. L., & CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
28.
TaylorH. (2000a). How the Internet is improving the lives of Americans with disabilities. The Harris Poll, 30.Los Angeles: Creators Syndicate.
29.
TaylorH. (2000b). Many people with disabilities feel isolated, left out of their communities and would like to participate more. The Harris Poll, 34.Los Angeles: Creators Syndicate.
30.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1999). Internet access, computer use, and disability status: 1999. Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP), unpublished tabulation [Online]. Available: <blue.census.gov/hhes/www/disable/dissipp.html>.
31.
UslanM. (1992). Barriers to acquiring assistive technology: Cost and lack of information. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 86, 402–07.
32.
World Wide Web Consortia, W3C. 2003. Web Accessibility Initiative [Online]. Available: <www.w3.org/WAI>.
